Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,039
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: SHAME ON TOM CRUISE IF...

Not sure if I believe this story, I suspect a lot relevant details are missing.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,672
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: SHAME ON TOM CRUISE IF...


wrote:

wrote:

the srories that are going around are true.  It has been stated that Suri desperately wants to see her father and he is not responding.  The story goes that he doesn't even want to see pictures of her because she is  no longer in his life, by his decision.  I hope if it is true, that he will have a change of heart and give that little girl the love of a father she so deserves.


 

@Lindsays Grandma

 

 

Oh please!  Care to state WHERE you read this?

 

Why are people getting their shorts in a knot over a story in a gossip rag?   

 

I also don't know why any divorce agreement would include the wife not date in public for 5 years?  Why would it matter after the dissolution?  oi vey


I read it in Cafe Mom which is a newsletter sent to me via e-mail.  Tinkrbl44,  if some people get their shorts in a knot that is their business, I have no control over that and I can assure you that just because I posted the article it wasn't because I got my shorts tied up in a knot.

 

Some people are interested and some aren't and for those who aren't interested the best thing under the circumstances is to just pass on by, ignore the thread. 

 

To this day I just cannot understand why people take their time to respond to a thread they have no interest in only to attack either the person who started it or everyone who took the time to post their thoughts.  If I am not interested or do not care for the subject I don't bother to reply, I just go on to the next one, and so on, and so on.  It appears that you got your shorts tied in a knot by what you wrote. Woman Wink

The moving finger writes; And having writ, Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line Nor all your Tears Wash out a Word of it. Omar Khayam
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,672
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: SHAME ON TOM CRUISE IF...


wrote:

Why get  emotionally involved or charged over the lives of celebrities.


Having a discussion about someone, or an issue about something does not fall in the category of being emotionally involved or charged over it.  If that were the case we wouldn't be able to discuss practically everything we talk about on a daily basis.  This was merely a common interest story.

The moving finger writes; And having writ, Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line Nor all your Tears Wash out a Word of it. Omar Khayam
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,672
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: SHAME ON TOM CRUISE IF...


wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

Why get  emotionally involved or charged over the lives of celebrities.


I totally agree.  I'm glad I don't have that obession.  


 

 

It’s not about celebs.  Good grief.


Thank you Noel7, I wonder if the article was about Joe Blow down the street that no one ever heard of the comments would have been different.

The moving finger writes; And having writ, Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line Nor all your Tears Wash out a Word of it. Omar Khayam