Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 36,947
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Looks to me like Princess Catherine and Queen Consort Camilla have their arms behind their husband's backs.

Super Contributor
Posts: 398
Registered: ‎11-12-2021

Beautiful!

Regular Contributor
Posts: 232
Registered: ‎04-25-2010

This portrait is quite historic, and I think should be turned into a beautiful painting. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 15,020
Registered: ‎03-15-2014

Officially, William is only 5" taller than his father (6' 3" vs 5' 10") but it looks like a lot more.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,063
Registered: ‎06-15-2014

Beautiful 

Highlighted
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,097
Registered: ‎09-05-2014

Interesting that the spot chosen for the pose was in front of a painting of King George III.

Regular Contributor
Posts: 232
Registered: ‎04-25-2010

@Johnnyeager wrote:

Interesting that the spot chosen for the pose was in front of a painting of King George III.


Yes! I noticed that too!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 78,280
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

 


@grandma2pkmh wrote:

Why are they called "portraits" and not photos?  I always thought portraits were painted.  I've noticed this on other photos of King Charles.  Is it a British thing?


@grandma2pkmh   You are mistaken.  Portrait photography has been around since the camera was invented.  It's certainly NOT just a British thing.

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,265
Registered: ‎05-24-2010

They all look wonderful in this photo. Especially considering they are in mourning. I think it is a striking picture of the past, present, and future king. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 32,629
Registered: ‎05-10-2010

@grandma2pkmh wrote:

Why are they called "portraits" and not photos?  I always thought portraits were painted.  I've noticed this on other photos of King Charles.  Is it a British thing?

 

I was wondering the same thing.  It might be a British thing.