Community Chat

[JJsMom]

Wasn't the case against him pretty weak? He had affairs. Doesn't make him a child killer.

His mistresses even said he gushed about how much he loved his son. He was also searching for vacation spots that were good for kids the day before the death.

What was the evidence that proved he premeditated this?

[Venezia]

Clearly, the case against him wasn't "weak".  The jurors saw all the evidence and found him guilty.

Evidence which included him getting out of his car 5 minutes after he left Chick-Fil-A with his son, in his work parking lot, and sexting one of his "women friends" to say that he loved his son but that they both "needed an escape".

Researching vacation spots "good for kids" the day before the child's death, obviously didn't cancel out researching how long it takes for a dog to die in a hot car.  But it's a good premeditated "cover up" for "I forgot to drop him off..."

And the 32 years was for knowlingly sexting an underage girl, sending her lewd photos of himself and asking her to return the favor.

Well, it looks like he got his escape, right into a jail cell for life.  If you think the case was "weak", read all the facts.  He got what he deserved; I hope he "enjoys" his "escape" in prison.