Community Chat

[Shanus]

---

@BirkiLady wrote:

---

@Squirrel Lover wrote:

Kachina, after your explanation of Antonella's latest behavior with the clothes shows, or any shows other than jewelry, and the crazy blonde hair, nails, tanning stuff, and constant self-deprecating comments on her figure, I think I see now why QVC let her go. 

I still feel really bad for her because she was likable, but you are right, QVC is a business and they have the right to have people there that they want to represent the company.

---

@Squirrel Lover  

I also wondered if the many negative comments had an impact on this decision about Antonella. Imagine QVC received many negative emails, which would have gone into her personnal file.

This pains me since she remained an excellent host IMO and I quickly became accostomed to her hair. I shall miss her happy personality and love of jewelry. Antonella is intelligent and will be fine. There are so many other places who would love to hire her! 

---

@BirkiLady   I can see your point, but I'm sure judging from comments about hosts here, they receive many negative emails/complaints about a few hosts that have remained. Their decisions are based on purely business. 

[NYCLatinaMe]

---

@RedTop wrote:
I don't think anyone needs to be concerned about the hosts who are gone. They had contracts that were severed for whatever reason, they had financial protections under that contract for situations like this. That contract also had a silence clause, so they cannot say anything more than confirm they no longer work at QVC. Their lives will go on as usual.

---

@RedTop how do you know the terms under which they were hired/fired?