Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,031
Registered: ‎10-22-2018

Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

At the moment the Blue Origin space capsule touched down, the altitude readout was -21 feet (minus 21 feet).

 

They landed in West Texas, not Death Valley.

 

Can anyone explain this?

 

Thanks....

 

 

 

 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,546
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

I belive that reading was "below sea level"?

 

I was a First Responder to Katrina. While in the infamous 9th Ward our gps indicated we were -feet below sea level.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,031
Registered: ‎10-22-2018

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

I estimate the elevation of the landing spot to be about 1500 feet.

 

I have watched the descent 100 times. Driving me crazy!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 69,790
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

[ Edited ]
  • The altitude in Van Horn, TX which was the blast off site is 4, 042 ft.  The touch down site must be in the same vacinity.

 

The landing pad is located at 31.4517°N 104.7628°W, about 6.1 km (3.8 mi) north of a check-out building and 3.2 km (2 mi) north of the launch pad.

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,031
Registered: ‎10-22-2018

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

@Kachina624  Is it possible that a spaceflight altimeter is measuring distance above the ground rather than distance above sea level? Is the altitude achieved above the elevation at takeoff more important than standard altitude measurement?

 

I'm just guessing here. I can't believe Bezos' toy was inaccurate.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 69,790
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

@PickyPicky3    That would be my conclusion. 

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,448
Registered: ‎03-29-2020

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

this kind of thing is why I'm not a scientist.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,031
Registered: ‎10-22-2018

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

@GoneButNotForgotten @Kachina624 @Snowpuppy 

 

That was a tough question, but this is a smart group. I sent my question to many, many VERY appropriate scientists and organizations but only the Smithsonian Museum of Air and Space could give me most of what I was looking for. I learned:

 

-Rockets need different tracking systems than airplanes because they go into thin/non- air environments.

-The Blue Origin landing site was indeed 21 feet lower than the launch site.

-Blue Origin could have used either the actual elevation or 0 feet at the launch site for the flight record. Their flight, their choice.

-Blue Origin only accepts questions from media (no big surprise).

 

It's pathetic that I have reached old age knowing zero about ground based tracking systems. Not even one piece of trivia.

 

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 69,790
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

@PickyPicky3    I commend you for your persistence. 

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,598
Registered: ‎01-14-2017

Re: Question for Science/Spaceflight Fans

 

Interesting @PickyPicky3 Thanks for posting.