Reply
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,356
Registered: ‎08-15-2014

Re: QUEEN ELIZABETH: Another 'Sign' (No. 2)


@BoopOMatic wrote:

That's beautiful.

The Queen had a wonderful faith. I'll miss her Christmas broadcast - I wonder if King Charles will take it on.


Yes, she did have wonderful faith.  I don't think her son is like her at all.  His views are much different than the Queen's.  He talks a good game, but he is and will be nothing like his mum.

 

May the Queen rest in the arms of God's grace and peace. Heart

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,113
Registered: ‎02-01-2015

Re: QUEEN ELIZABETH: Another 'Sign' (No. 2)

 

 

the weather has been glorious for her travels home

 

sun

 

blue skies

 

queengoinghome2.jpg

~~today may be my last.....i choose JOY!~~
Honored Contributor
Posts: 79,467
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: QUEEN ELIZABETH: Another 'Sign' (No. 2)

[ Edited ]

Pure nonsense.  That appears to be a reflection on the camera lens, not a sunbeam.  The photographer was probably able to manipulate the camera to put the reflection where he wanted it.

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,543
Registered: ‎06-17-2015

Re: QUEEN ELIZABETH: Another 'Sign' (No. 2)

[ Edited ]

I have to be honest-the double rainbow is a given, even though the second one is not very visible.

 

However, I watched every moment of this and I cannot say I ever saw this beam of sunlight.  

 

I'm not saying it didn't happen but if it brings comfort to some, go with it.

 

Sometimes a brief moment can do wonders and even if the result of a camera lens,  it still brought something personal to those who believe otherwise.  I do wonder why only one camera caught the phenom but so be it.

 

No harm done.

"" Compassion is a verb."-Thich Nhat Hanh
Valued Contributor
Posts: 586
Registered: ‎01-20-2022

Re: QUEEN ELIZABETH: Another 'Sign' (No. 2)

If you and others believe this, then great!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 48,942
Registered: ‎08-23-2010

Re: QUEEN ELIZABETH: Another 'Sign' (No. 2)

 

A sign of WHAT, exactly?

Honored Contributor
Posts: 9,740
Registered: ‎05-19-2012

Re: QUEEN ELIZABETH: Another 'Sign' (No. 2)

Tinkrbl44, that you needed to ask this question indicates that the answer would mean little or nothing to you.  I'm not being evasive or disrespectful -- simply stating a truth.

 

Those who are in sync with this sort of thought or sentiment, do not need to ask this question.

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 48,942
Registered: ‎08-23-2010

Re: QUEEN ELIZABETH: Another 'Sign' (No. 2)


@Kachina624 wrote:

Pure nonsense.  That appears to be a reflection on the camera lens, not a sunbeam.  The photographer was probably able to manipulate the camera to put the reflection where he wanted it.


 

@Kachina624   @golding76 

 

People will read into this all sorts of things.  Personally, I think the only "sign" we can be sure of is that it was a cloudy day.  That's it.