Reply
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,644
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

@Cakers3 wrote:
This is about victims of sex trafficking, abuse.

Not about wickless candles and bad tasting jam.

It shows how much some really give a flying fig about victims.
It doesn't MATTER who started it. This isn't kindergarten.
The whole MM obsession matters more???

Every day I learn just who cares about victims around here.

#metoo indeed.


Yes this isn't kindergarten. It's a shopping channel forum where people can post what they want. Mods decide what's allowed and what's not. Who cares if an MM post pops up?  If you're so offended by it just ignore it and move on. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,100
Registered: ‎06-17-2015
@KKJ

Right to post and blah blah blah 🙄

Shows just how important MM is to you over sex victims.

Have a wonderful day focused on her.

#metoo indeed.

SMH

"" Compassion is a verb."-Thich Nhat Hanh
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,242
Registered: ‎05-24-2010

@Cakers3 wrote:
@KKJ

Right to post and blah blah blah 🙄

Shows just how important MM is to you over sex victims.

Have a wonderful day focused on her.

#metoo indeed.

SMH


Talking about a Meghan Markle,  or her jam product doesn’t mean someone doesn’t care about serious issues. It’s possible, and normal, to engage with both. People are capable of holding more than one thought at a time.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,759
Registered: ‎01-02-2011

I don't give a flying fig if men on "my side" face legal consequences for their behavior, @Cakers3

It is impossible not to notice one person's panic over this issue despite how he campaigned.

 

I do think that if there was truly damning evidence on someone like Clinton it would be out there with the partisan cabinet members and head of the FBI. 🤷‍♀️

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,825
Registered: ‎10-19-2012

@manny2 wrote:

@Cakers3 wrote:
@KKJ

Right to post and blah blah blah 🙄

Shows just how important MM is to you over sex victims.

Have a wonderful day focused on her.

#metoo indeed.

SMH


Talking about a Meghan Markle,  or her jam product doesn’t mean someone doesn’t care about serious issues. It’s possible, and normal, to engage with both. People are capable of holding more than one thought at a time.


 

 

This thread has discussed Jacqueline Kennedy, the Queen, Fergie, etc. but if someone mentions MM they don't care about trafficking victims.  Why weren't the posters who mentioned other people in their posts chastised?

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,759
Registered: ‎01-02-2011

The Queen and Fergie are connected to Andrew.

 

We have oodles and oodles of MM posts and very few about Andrew,

 

 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,825
Registered: ‎10-19-2012

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@tansy wrote:

The Queen and Fergie are connected to Andrew.

 

We have oodles and oodles of MM posts and very few about Andrew,

 

 


 

 

The poster said that this thread was about the trafficking victims and not about anyone else.

 

"This is about victims of sex trafficking, abuse."

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,242
Registered: ‎05-24-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@lgfan wrote:

@manny2 wrote:

@Cakers3 wrote:
@KKJ

Right to post and blah blah blah 🙄

Shows just how important MM is to you over sex victims.

Have a wonderful day focused on her.

#metoo indeed.

SMH


Talking about a Meghan Markle,  or her jam product doesn’t mean someone doesn’t care about serious issues. It’s possible, and normal, to engage with both. People are capable of holding more than one thought at a time.


 

 

This thread has discussed Jacqueline Kennedy, the Queen, Fergie, etc. but if someone mentions MM they don't care about trafficking victims.  Why weren't the posters who mentioned other people in their posts chastised?


Meghan Markle’s name in a conversation, is the only person who can turn jam into a moral crisis. @lgfan 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,644
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

@lgfan wrote:

@tansy wrote:

The Queen and Fergie are connected to Andrew.

 

We have oodles and oodles of MM posts and very few about Andrew,

 

 


 

 

The poster said that this thread was about the trafficking victims and not about anyone else.

 

"This is about victims of sex trafficking, abuse."


I just smh at some posters who scold others regarding what they think should only be posted on a thread. Again, this is a shopping channel forum and people will post various things. But yeah, we don't care at all about victims. Good grief. You know, I'm sure there are a thousand forums where ONLY child sex trafficking is discussed all day long and you wouldn't be annoyed by a random post about something else. But let's keep scolding others who don't post what you deem acceptable. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,759
Registered: ‎01-02-2011

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

And I SMH at the posters who scold anyone for posting about Andrew on the constant, ongoing H&M threads. We are told to start our own thread.

 

It goes both ways, @KKJ