Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,508
Registered: ‎12-16-2013

I'm sure that the Queen's dogs are and will continue to be well taken care of by Sarah.

She and Andrew probably treat the dogs better than the women that Andrew was with.  

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,546
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@Linmo wrote:

I'm sure that the Queen's dogs are and will continue to be well taken care of by Sarah.

She and Andrew probably treat the dogs better than the women that Andrew was with.  


I totally agree except they were girls (children), not women.


'I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man'.......Unknown
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,625
Registered: ‎05-09-2023

@reiki604 wrote:

@Linmo wrote:

I'm sure that the Queen's dogs are and will continue to be well taken care of by Sarah.

She and Andrew probably treat the dogs better than the women that Andrew was with.  


I totally agree except they were girls (children), not women.


It's okay though, because they were 15 year olds and not 8 year olds. Big difference, dontcha know.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,242
Registered: ‎05-24-2010

@Lakelife62 wrote:

@reiki604 wrote:

@Linmo wrote:

I'm sure that the Queen's dogs are and will continue to be well taken care of by Sarah.

She and Andrew probably treat the dogs better than the women that Andrew was with.  


I totally agree except they were girls (children), not women.


It's okay though, because they were 15 year olds and not 8 year olds. Big difference, dontcha know.


Nobody said it was ok; it is not ok. Abuse of a minor is indefensible, whether the victim is 8 or 15. But, there is a distinction between prepubescent children and adolescents.  

The cognitive, emotional, and developmental disparities matter.

Highlighted
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,625
Registered: ‎05-09-2023
Isn't it so interesting how the bar for degenerate behavior keeps being pushed lower and lower? Crazy times, we are in.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 14,661
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@Lakelife62 wrote:
Isn't it so interesting how the bar for degenerate behavior keeps being pushed lower and lower? Crazy times, we are in.

@Lakelife62  yes, I agree. I had a Pastor once who equated getting used to sin, or degenerate behavior to the Frog in the beaker experiment. Basically you can warm the water, hotter and hotter slowly, in small increments til the frog doesn't notice and slowly dies.  He never told us that one again!!!  The congregation complained .    But, I never forgot ., it's so true. The degenerating and sin start slow.each time escalating... then it doesn't seem so bad, so you up yourself again, and again ,never noticing how far you have sunk,  Each time it doesn't seem so bad until you are immersed ...Yada yada. Until.....

 

one thing people forget. There is an age law for a reason.  If you don't agree fine, but you are breaking the law.  That at least should be dealt with. Jmho.  If money or favors are traded then deal with that!!

but who knows. I guess now legally you can remove your name from a document if you have power or money, and you don't get into trouble. 

moral!  if you are poor, or a different political persuasion don't get into trouble. If you are rich and powerful, it's all ok

 

ETA a couple errors in spelling

“sometimes you have to bite your upper lip and put sunglasses on”….Bob Dylan
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,349
Registered: ‎05-01-2010

@manny2 in this country the age of concent is 18. Anyone under 18 cannot give concent. Statutory rape is bad enogh but trafficking girls for sexual purposes is awful. The victims need justice.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 14,661
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]
 
“sometimes you have to bite your upper lip and put sunglasses on”….Bob Dylan
Honored Contributor
Posts: 14,661
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@shoekitty wrote:

@chessylady wrote:

@manny2 in this country the age of concent is 18. Anyone under 18 cannot give concent. Statutory rape is bad enogh but trafficking girls for sexual purposes is awful. The victims need justice.


@chessylady   in the USA the age of concent  varies from 16-18.  it can vary, not just from State to State , but sometime county to county.   But please vet me. I know in California the legal age of concent  for a women is 18.  They better check the drivers license, lol and it better be her 18th Birthday.  Under 18 she is a minor.  A few states are 16, Oklahoma, Washington, Indiana, Michigan, etc., New York is 17 I think. You know, I think 17 is a good age myself. But I am no judge of that. jmho.  


 

“sometimes you have to bite your upper lip and put sunglasses on”….Bob Dylan
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,349
Registered: ‎05-01-2010

@shoekitty yes, I live in California and you are correct, some states have lower ages of consent. As a society, we need to protect our children not exploit them.