Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 43,172
Registered: ā€Ž03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted


@Greeneyedlady21 wrote:

And I think his feet look larger in the picture because of the way it was photographed. And that accounts for the distortion of the forget me nots.


 

 

@Greeneyedlady21 

 

i agree......

 

BUT, it is kind of a shame that someone felt the need to alter a photo of baby feet!

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein
Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,197
Registered: ā€Ž03-10-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

@50Mickey  You can Google since you seem unaware.

I compare to Kate because Kate is an example of proper behavior, doing what is expected of a royal. The same is expected of Meghan no matter that Harry is sixth in line.

 

The non doctor signing refers to the proclamation that was posted out side the palace.

 

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,111
Registered: ā€Ž06-17-2015

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

For heaven's sake it's not like Meghan is picking her nose in public.

 

What is up with all this comparison anyway?  Plenty of people in the royal family and if Meghan and Harry want to do things their way so what??

 

Are they breaking some laws or something??

 

I think they are great; no looking down their noses, doing the best they can while living in a fishbowl, dealing with really unkind remarks, especially about wee Archie.

 

Kate is lovely, Kate does what Kate needs to do. 

Meghan is lovely, and does what Meghan needs to do.

 

They are, after, all, people, despite titles.

"" Compassion is a verb."-Thich Nhat Hanh
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,640
Registered: ā€Ž05-21-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

@occasionalrain  Of course you didn't cite official written and unwritten rules and procedures that Meghan and Harry have broken because there are none just in your mind from what "others have said." Did you not see the picture of the Queen and Prince Phillip with Harry and Meghan and Archie? They looked absolutely delighted. Oh that's right they were probably faking it for the cameras.  I find it very sad and telling  that there are those who can't find it in their heart to be happy for the birth of a sweet baby. And

instead of wishing the parents well spread malicious gossip and  nasty innuendos.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,860
Registered: ā€Ž03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

I  swear, some people won't be happy until a film clip from Rosemary's Baby is posted.

~The only difference between this place and the Titanic is that the Titanic had a band.~
Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,603
Registered: ā€Ž03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

From ABC News May 8th

 

Archie was born Monday, May 6, at 5:26 a.m. local time, weighing 7 pounds, 3 ounces. Meghan gave birth to him at Portland Hospital, a private hospital in London, according to a royal source. A birth announcement from Buckingham Palace indicated the duke and duchess were back home at Frogmore Cottage that day.

What is good for the goose today will also be good for the gander tomorrow.
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,922
Registered: ā€Ž03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted


@sunshine45 wrote:

@Greeneyedlady21 wrote:

And I think his feet look larger in the picture because of the way it was photographed. And that accounts for the distortion of the forget me nots.


 

 

@Greeneyedlady21 

 

i agree......

 

BUT, it is kind of a shame that someone felt the need to alter a photo of baby feet!


I’m missing something—how was the photo altered?

Honored Contributor
Posts: 43,172
Registered: ā€Ž03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

[ Edited ]

@jonbon wrote:

@sunshine45 wrote:

@Greeneyedlady21 wrote:

And I think his feet look larger in the picture because of the way it was photographed. And that accounts for the distortion of the forget me nots.


 

 

@Greeneyedlady21 

 

i agree......

 

BUT, it is kind of a shame that someone felt the need to alter a photo of baby feet!


I’m missing something—how was the photo altered?


 

 

@jonbon 

 

probably by an app that changes the photo.

it would explain why the feet and hand may look big and the flowers are distorted.

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,353
Registered: ā€Ž03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

[ Edited ]

@sunshine45 wrote:

probably by an app that changes the photo.

it would explain why the feet and hand nay look big and the flowers are distorted.


ARGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! I give up. There's some that just won't be convinced. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 43,172
Registered: ā€Ž03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted


@Sushismom wrote:

@sunshine45 wrote:

probably by an app that changes the photo.

it would explain why the feet and hand nay look big and the flowers are distorted.


ARGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! I give up. There's some that just won't be convinced. 


 

 

 

LOL @Sushismom  what do i need to be "convinced" of?

********************************************
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." - Albert Einstein