Community Chat

[Greeneyedlady21]

It just gets all kinds of kooky crazier here every day where all things Meghan are concerned.

[Sushismom]

By the way, the Royal Family costs U.K. taxpayers about 86 cents a year. All other income comes from separate sources. I know many here think they are fully funded by taxes, which is NOT correct. 

[RoughDraft]

---

@occasionalrain wrote:

Meghan and Harry have brought it on themselves with all their privacy nonsense. No one suspected deception concerning Kate's pregnancies nor any other royal births. Their privacy following delivery was never violated.  

---

Oh I see now.  The doubters probably want a video of the actual delivery and even then they'd say it was fake.  SMH.

[goldensrbest]

I think it is a nice picture with his feet, and the flowers for di., i really do not get all the questions about his birth, that i see on here,just do not get all the dislike for megan.

[Greeneyedlady21]

And I think his feet look larger in the picture because of the way it was photographed. And that accounts for the distortion of the forget me nots.

[Puppy Lips]

Nice photo.  But I have to say I am already tired about all the hoop-la around them.  I bet if all the photographers and journalists really left them alone and were not interested, then they would be dumb-struck, and craving to get the attention back.

Don't mind me -- I am a bit crabby today.

[golding76]

Some folks might be genuine doubters, but I believe that others are stating that with all the secrecy surrounding detail now, suspicions do pop into their mind even if they harbor no ill feelings toward Meghan and Harry.  

The main point is that had the couple proceeded in the usual manner, there most likely would not have been all the speculation and looniness that some report to be on the Internet.  I do not read such sites, so I am unfamiliar with what has been written.

Maybe a Greta Garbo effect is taking place:  The more the couple tries to avoid publicity and scrutiny, the more curious we become.

[Marp]

---

@occasionalrain wrote:

After the birth, at home, with plenty of security, where is the harm in disclosing the place of birth and the name/names of the attending doctor?  They are in the public and financed by the British taxpayers. 

---

Going by that logic then anyone here in the public eye that is paid or supported by the American taxpayers should be okay with the same kind of intrusions into their lives.  Therefore, boy do I have questions.and not one relates to a Royal.

[50Mickey]

What is all the secrecy that some of you keep harping on? What will you gain if you know the name of the hospital or if it were a home birth? No one here or in the UK is entitled to the details of this child's birth I don't care who paid for it. If an individual has on baby in this country and Medicaid pays for the prenatal care and birth no one is entitled to the information about the mother or the baby's care. This wold be a HIPPA violation. There is such a thing as Dr.- patient confidentiality. I sure it exists in the UK.  Meghan and Harry have announced that their baby was born on May 6, they had a photo op. and interview. They owe us nothing more. If Kate wants to parade out 4 hours after giving birth with her newborn and pose for photos that's her business. Meghan chose not to and that's her business. If some of you chose to believe in a conspiracy that's your problem. 

[Shawnie]

---

@golding76 wrote:

Some folks might be genuine doubters, but I believe that others are stating that with all the secrecy surrounding detail now, suspicions do pop into their mind even if they harbor no ill feelings toward Meghan and Harry.  

The main point is that had the couple proceeded in the usual manner, there most likely would not have been all the speculation and looniness that some report to be on the Internet.  I do not read such sites, so I am unfamiliar with what has been written.

Maybe a Greta Garbo effect is taking place:  The more the couple tries to avoid publicity and scrutiny, the more curious we become.

---

I thought it was loony too until I remembered him saying how sleep deprived he was and how much the baby had changed in two weeks (quickly changed to 2 days).  Doubt he would feel sleep deprived in 2-3 days, 2 weeks yes.  And slipping up and saying how much he had changed in 2 weeks, LOL.  Also look at her thumb in that picture,  Not the same manicure style as the rest of her fingers.  Why they would create all the secrecy, who knows.  They will be in the limelight the rest of their lives, and both of them are used to that, and knew that was part of the deal.  😬