Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,916
Registered: ‎03-14-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

It's a lovely photo of a newborn's feet. Meghan is obviously not 2 weeks postpartum from the pics we saw. The baby was born on May 6. Why does everything have to be a conspiracy?
Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,064
Registered: ‎06-11-2011

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

[ Edited ]

@KingstonsMom wrote:

@fthunt wrote:

@cherry You make a very good point.  Something is odd with this picture.  Why not show the face?


 

@fthunt 

 

For privacy. Harry and Meghan are big on privacy and not adhering to Royal protocol.

 

The same reason they aren't releasing any information regarding where he was actually born nor who her/his medical team was, which is usually mentioned in the birth announcements that the Palace issues.

 

That information was listed in the Palace birth announcements for all of William & Kate's births as well as Harry and William's births.


 That's true but the particular birth attendants - whether doctors or midwives - could give up their location, which the couple wanted to keep private.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,658
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

@Pearlee 

 

They COULD, but they would never betray the Royal family's wishes, if they didn't want it disclosed, if they ever wanted to work with the Royal family again.

 

The British media has already tracked down one female OB/GYN Dr. that was 'rumored' to be a choice of Meghan's and she refused to say anything other than she, "couldn't say anything". 

You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have.
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,136
Registered: ‎06-25-2018

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

thefeet just do not look like a newborn's feet.  the ankle andleg seem to me to be  of a much older baby.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,147
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

The IG post does not say this is Archie.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,658
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted


@Shawnie wrote:

The IG post does not say this is Archie.


@Shawnie 

 

Yes, it does:

 

"Meghan and Harry have posted an adorable new photo of baby Archie Harrison today"

You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have.
Highlighted
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,147
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

@KingstonsMom @Not on my IG.BB3C7309-AB7C-4888-90A7-31639D1C48CE.png29D612C9-2657-47C5-93D7-AA271A883C33.pngC13D326D-B29D-4460-A8AC-A09F2BD9035C.png

Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,658
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

@Shawnie

 

According to news reports: 

 

"Buckingham Palace has confirmed to MailOnline that the photograph features Archie and the Duchess of Sussex."

 

You can Google it or think whatever you want.

 

I have no investment either way.

 

 

You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have.
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,147
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted


@KingstonsMom wrote:

@Shawnie

 

According to news reports: 

 

"Buckingham Palace has confirmed to MailOnline that the photograph features Archie and the Duchess of Sussex."

 

You can Google it or think whatever you want.

 

I have no investment either way.

 

 


Since even a news source had the need to confirm I guess then that i am in good company!  

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,104
Registered: ‎06-07-2010

Re: New 'Archie' Photo Posted

@shortbreadlover @fthunt @cherry   That was the first thing I said.......that's not a 6 day old baby...........much older.