Community Chat

[occasionalrain]

Posters themselves have often claimed that they reported a thread.

Anyone who regularly visits these forums is well aware of that.

[JeanLouiseFinch]

---

@DREAMON wrote:

It sounds like they are going backwards to me. 

Nothing seems to be leading to anything that will find this poor woman...and so much time has passed.

With the DNA not providing any matches they have little to nothing to go on.

---

It sure does, @DREAMON.  A spot by Megyn Kelly just popped up and she's totally fed up with Nanos.  She said Matt Finn (FOX) tried to pin Nanos down as to how the family is suddenly cleared after the sheriff saying Monday that no one is cleared.  Finn asked if DNA evidence cleared them and Sheriff Nanos said he wasn't going there.  MK is strongly suspicious that the sheriff got a phone call from Savannah and that was that.  The FBI needs to take over and get Nanos out of the way,  You don't exclude people based on feelings! 

[JeanLouiseFinch]

@Teddixat  Bad Bunny has nothing to do with this discussion but I happen to agree with what she said.

MK knows her stuff, is well studied, experienced, informed reliable, and fact based.

@Mersha No one is “in charge” of this thread.

It’s unfair to try and stifle me when there are members who are repeatedly divisive.

Don’t like it, don’t read it, don't interact with me, but we can respect one another’s right to post as long as we stay within the forum guidelines.

[SilleeMee]

I don't know who 'MK' is...??

[PJinIA]

---

@SilleeMee wrote:

I don't know who 'MK' is...??

---

Megyn Kelly I assume.

[tansy]

Message 632, @SilleeMee 

[DREAMON]

I personally like to read all the opinions on this subject (all sides) especially taking into consideration that all involved seem to have hit a brick wall. I just hope they know a lot more than they are letting us know but it doesn’t seem that way to me. They don’t even talk about the ransom notes anymore. I thought she was brought over the border and I still believe that. I am also thinking that unfortunately she is no longer alive and they have no proof of it to show the family and the kidnapping/ransom fell apart. I just hope they get proof of something for the sake of the family.

[Mersha]

Got it.

Several posters asked nicely to have one source taken out of the discussion as they are, markedly, very divisive.

Apparently, they are to skip the offensive posts as the poster has the right to include them.

I must see how this works out.  There is a looming possibility it will be permissible to use Rachel Maddow's reporting and opinions here freely which I have not done because I have a right to post opinions here.

RACHEL MADDOW CREDENTIALS

Rachel Maddow is a prominent MSNBC host, political commentator, and #1

New York Times bestselling author, known for anchoring The Rachel Maddow Show since 2008. She holds a doctorate in politics from Oxford University (Rhodes Scholar) and a bachelor’s degree from Stanford University, beginning her career in radio before joining Air America. 

Key Credentials and Background

• Education: Earned a Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy from Stanford University (1994) and was awarded a John Gardner Fellowship for public service. She later earned a D.Phil. in politics from Oxford University (2001) as a Rhodes Scholar, with a thesis on HIV/AIDS and health care reform.
• Broadcasting Career: Began her career in1999 on WRNX in Holyoke, Mass., and gained national prominence as a host on Air America Radio in 2004. She joined MSNBC as a political analyst in 2008 and launched The Rachel Maddow Show in September 2008.
• Media Impact: As the first openly gay anchor to host a prime-time news program in the U.S., she has been recognized for in-depth, analytical coverage of national stories.
• Published Work: Author of multiple #1 New York Times bestsellers, including DRIFT: The Unmooring of American Military Power (2012), Blowout (2019), and Prequel (2023).
• Audio/Podcasting: Created and hosted successful, investigative podcasts for MSNBC, including Bag Man (2018) and

[Oznell]

As of today, Feb. 17,  CBS is still reporting that "other" DNA ( not glove DNA) found in the house, that is not Nancy Guthrie's, is still being analyzed.  

I may be confused at this point, but hasn't this been going on for quite a while? I thought the mention of this other DNA being analyzed occurred early on. 

But perhaps it takes much longer to sort and analyze than we would hope. Imagine how many different people have touched things in any given house or property over time. Workers, friends, delivery people, relatives...

[febe1]

Back to Square One on Nancy!