Community Chat

[occasionalrain]

I don't watch the podcasts, not any of them. To me they are disrespectful.

[RescueLover]

@Etoile308 🌸


WOW that’s impressive that You have all that down pat !!


At one point wasn’t an employee at Nancy’s favorite Mexican restaurant mentioned too ?


I feel the same as @manny2 when it comes to what I read and hear.

[manny2]

People with intact judgment can distinguish what’s plausible from what isn’t. A podcaster isn’t going to sway either way. Without baseline judgment, the source doesn’t matter.

[JeanLouiseFinch]

IMO, a podcast is a modern upgraded version of talk radio - sort of.  People come into a conversation with some knowledge of the topic and state their opinions based on their own knowledge and experiences.  Anyone with half a brain can distinguish between reasonable well thought out remarks, whether they agree or not, and outlandish nonsense.

As for including the fellowship ladies in the investigation.  That makes perfect sense to me.  The police investigators need to be unbiased and systematically eliminate potential suspects.  They start at the inner circle and work outward. So, yes, that would include those friends but they were probably eliminated quickly.  If it were my loved one who was missing I'd expect the same, leaving no stone unturned.  

[manny2]

---

@JeanLouiseFinch wrote:

IMO, a podcast is a modern upgraded version of talk radio - sort of.  People come into a conversation with some knowledge of the topic and state their opinions based on their own knowledge and experiences.  Anyone with half a brain can distinguish between reasonable well thought out remarks, whether they agree or not, and outlandish nonsense.

As for including the fellowship ladies in the investigation.  That makes perfect sense to me.  The police investigators need to be unbiased and systematically eliminate potential suspects.  They start at the inner circle and work outward. So, yes, that would include those friends but they were probably eliminated quickly.  If it were my loved one who was missing I'd expect the same, leaving no stone unturned.  

---

I agree @JeanLouiseFinch At the end of the day, if someone doesn’t like podcasts, that’s fine, people gravitate toward what they prefer. But they aren’t all operating with some nefarious intent.

[tansy]

---

@manny2 wrote:

---

@JeanLouiseFinch wrote:

IMO, a podcast is a modern upgraded version of talk radio - sort of.  People come into a conversation with some knowledge of the topic and state their opinions based on their own knowledge and experiences.  Anyone with half a brain can distinguish between reasonable well thought out remarks, whether they agree or not, and outlandish nonsense.

As for including the fellowship ladies in the investigation.  That makes perfect sense to me.  The police investigators need to be unbiased and systematically eliminate potential suspects.  They start at the inner circle and work outward. So, yes, that would include those friends but they were probably eliminated quickly.  If it were my loved one who was missing I'd expect the same, leaving no stone unturned.  

---

I agree @JeanLouiseFinch At the end of the day, if someone doesn’t like podcasts, that’s fine, people gravitate toward what they prefer. But they aren’t all operating with some nefarious intent.

---

The problems are the algorithm and the increasing AI content. 

[manny2]

---

@tansy wrote:

---

@manny2 wrote:

---

@JeanLouiseFinch wrote:

IMO, a podcast is a modern upgraded version of talk radio - sort of.  People come into a conversation with some knowledge of the topic and state their opinions based on their own knowledge and experiences.  Anyone with half a brain can distinguish between reasonable well thought out remarks, whether they agree or not, and outlandish nonsense.

As for including the fellowship ladies in the investigation.  That makes perfect sense to me.  The police investigators need to be unbiased and systematically eliminate potential suspects.  They start at the inner circle and work outward. So, yes, that would include those friends but they were probably eliminated quickly.  If it were my loved one who was missing I'd expect the same, leaving no stone unturned.  

---

I agree @JeanLouiseFinch At the end of the day, if someone doesn’t like podcasts, that’s fine, people gravitate toward what they prefer. But they aren’t all operating with some nefarious intent.

---

The problems are the algorithm and the increasing AI content. 

---

An algorithm is just a set of instructions for processing information; it isn’t a framework for judging motives or accuracy in a podcast. And increasing AI content, is a separate issue entirely. If there’s a specific problem with what the podcast said, it has to be shown through the evidence they presented.

[tansy]

But the algorithm determines what type of content will be offered up to the listener or viewer. 

[manny2]

---

@tansy wrote:

But the algorithm determines what type of content will be offered up to the listener or viewer. 

---

Algorithms push content to audiences. They don’t shape the content or determine whether it’s accurate. We are focusing on accuracy. Many here feel they are spewing rumors and misinformation.

[RescueLover]

Nancy Grace un covers that when the Uber driver picked up Nancy the suspect(s) was already in the area.


Sounds like Uber Driver’s vehicle may have footage of suspect’s vehicle.