Re: Law Enforcement

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@RescueLover wrote:
It wasn’t a burglary gone wrong.

He stated his motivation was strong and he was able to control Nancy even when she tried to fight him off and resist leaving the house.

He most likely hit her and that caused the blood loss.

He also believes he’s since changed his appearance, sold his vehicle etc.

But he believes the suspect made mistakes and will be caught !!

That was my thought when I first saw the blood on the front porch @RescueLover .

From an analytical standpoint, the blood outside the front door suggests that whatever happened may have begun at the threshold, the point where someone being forced out would naturally resist. If a person is confronted inside their home and an attempt is made to remove them, the doorway becomes the first physical barrier, and it’s where a struggle is most likely to start.

The lack of medication being taken and the presence of visible bleeding raises questions about intent. In a typical kidnapping scenario, the abductors usually try to keep the victim stable because the victim is the “asset.” Allowing injury or leaving behind essential medication doesn’t align with that pattern. Those details point away from a scenario where the goal was to keep the person safe for leverage, and more toward a scenario where the individual’s wellbeing was not a priority.

This doesn’t prove motive, but it does highlight inconsistencies between what would be expected in a planned abduction versus what was observed.

San Antonio Gal · ‎05-18-2017

@Daludog wrote:
I watch The Interview Room and enjoy it a lot, though sometimes very long. I heard about a youtuber called, "Monks intrigue" it is just a kid maybe 30 with many short videos about the Gunthrie case and other older ones. I was impressed and enjoyed him, even though not a professional he shares latest facts and analyzing key points. Not for many I'm sure, but some may enjoy the short videos.

@Daludog - Thanks for sharing the name of this You Tuber. I watched him. Interesting.

elated · ‎06-09-2010

@Daludog wrote:
The one I was shocked by on "Monks Intrigue" is called "Watching the video Inverted" it's 15 minutes long.

@Daludog I think the Interview Room is ok but it is much too long to get information. The other day they had live call ins, it was not worth it.

I did enjoy Monks Intrigue, he was very analytical and his points made sense. I like the shortness and to the point.

JeanLouiseFinch · ‎10-03-2011

The Interview Room - New Drop Tonight 4-26-26

"Sgt. Cross Responds to Sheriff Nanos' 22-page Defense..."

Etoile308 · ‎01-04-2014

They really are hard up for content. How much more can they milk the Guthrie case?

That's the same reason I don't find Monk that intriguing. Each video picking apart the slightest detail of web sleuthing to confirm their bias. Waffling with the most current YouTube rumors. So are those women's Skechers Sherlock indicates are being worn by the person on the porch? How does one rectify that with the implication that someone's gait is identical to a different family member? Perhaps the obvious being pushed from the beginning isn't so obvious.

Anything to create content and build their channel. Hear that register ring. What do they call them? Tragedy Vampires?

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@Etoile308 wrote:
They really are hard up for content. How much more can they milk the Guthrie case?

That's the same reason I don't find Monk that intriguing. Each video picking apart the slightest detail of web sleuthing to confirm their bias. Waffling with the most current YouTube rumors. So are those women's Skechers Sherlock indicates are being worn by the person on the porch? How does one rectify that with the implication that someone's gait is identical to a different family member? Perhaps the obvious being pushed from the beginning isn't so obvious.

Anything to create content and build their channel. Hear that register ring. What do they call them? Tragedy Vampires?

I enjoy the podcasts, and I think their background gives them a certain perspective, but it’s still commentary based on the limited information that is public. Experience can add context, but it doesn’t automatically make every interpretation accurate. I take what they say as one viewpoint among many, not something definitive. If they had access to the full details of the case, I’d give their conclusions more weight, but without that, it’s still just an outside opinion.

cody2 · ‎03-19-2010

I read an article this morning stating that NBC is very disappointed that Savana's return did not bring an uptick in viewers like they had planned on. Oh my goodness. Can that be true? Experience says YES it can.

Daludog · ‎02-05-2011

I agree with what most have said about podcasts. There is limited information, but I think the more attention , the more people will see it and that could help solve it. I respect the older retired people, and enjoy some younger ones who may have different ideas, and more tech knowledge than older people, that could benefit the case.