Re: Law Enforcement

JeanLouiseFinch · ‎10-03-2011

Nancy had her own car, but I believe night driving was a concern so she ordered the Uber. It's perplexing, why either Annie of Tomasso didn't run over to get her. 🤷‍♀️

RescueLover · ‎02-06-2022

Brian Entin is heading back to Arizona.

JeanLouiseFinch · ‎10-03-2011

@RescueLover wrote:

Brian Entin is heading back to Arizona.

What do you think that means, @RescueLover ? Do you think he received a heads up that something is about to happen, like an arrest?

RescueLover · ‎02-06-2022

@JeanLouiseFinch 🌼

That’s what I was thinking too, but he didn’t let on that he had any new leads.

Etoile308 · ‎01-04-2014

Perhaps there are a few panel members on The Interview Room, other than Maureen who still seems to be working privately, that don't keep abreast of current investigative techniques and technology. Or is Chris just disingenuous in his comments?

When you have Dr. Brucato, the voice of reason on the show, offering his opinions that frequently don't come close to what Chris has his mind set on, there's no follow-up. The needle keeps in the same directions it's been planted on.

An individual is repeatedly being indicated and tarnished as someone involved without any evidence presented at this time. Public perception is reinforced all the while saying he doesn't know that this person is involved but, but, but... How about we just wait until an arrest is made.

We don't know what has panned out for law enforcement. It's not our place to know. What I do know is that each point Chris wants to make regarding an individual's seized vehicle, electronics, home searches, and yes polygraphs of individuals who have no reason to lie, can be done as investigative tools to verify statements, and to eliminate and move on. It's also done to indicate that all possibilities are considered and no one individual was the focus of the investigation. This can preemptively be useful when the case is prosecuted so defense can't argue police tunnel vision on their client.

Chris takes the populace stance. That helps his agenda, because he certainly does have one. Like me, subscribe to me, view me, make me some money.

And again, concerning the Pima County Sheriff's Department, the no confidence vote against the Sheriff was 241 votes. That works out to approximately 27% of the deputies.

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

What Chris says and thinks might be uncomfortable for some. The point is that law enforcement did take the brother‑in‑law’s car for 41 days, they did go through his home, and they did talk to his neighbors. That’s not nothing. They clearly focused on him.

And if you listen to Dr. Brucato, he’s not as direct as Chris, but he’s not dismissing anyone either. He’s more subtle, but he has repeatedly said they should not have ruled anyone out, and he’s also mentioned more than once that he believes this is someone within her circle. That aligns with the idea that no one should be taken off the table prematurely.

No one is saying he’s guilty, only that he hasn’t been ruled out. And he shouldn’t be. They don’t have a suspect, so everyone is still in this until they do. He’s pointing out what they did: the car, the home, talking to neighbors. Could it be because they were the last ones to see her? Sure. Is it within the realm of possibility they’re involved? Sure.

And about the deputies, this isn’t coming out of thin air. You can look this up. Over the years, multiple non‑union or non‑represented deputies have publicly described similar issues: intimidation, retaliation concerns, favoritism, and feeling bullied. These comments have come up in interviews, local reporting, and public meetings. It’s not one person saying it, it’s a repeated pattern that’s been documented.

That doesn’t prove anything by itself, but when different people who don’t know each other describe the same behavior, it becomes a pattern worth paying attention to. That’s why people say, “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.”

RescueLover · ‎02-06-2022

I enjoy listening to everyone’s opinions and theories. Especially because Nancy remaining missing is staying relevant.

The major news channels seem to have moved on because of what’s happening elsewhere.

I’m also wondering when Savannah comes back on April 6th, if this will enrage the suspect and maybe get him to blow his cover.

My husband thinks it was a case of revenge. He hasn’t changed his belief since Day 1. Can’t imagine what Nancy would have done, so thinking the suspect wants Savannah’s attention.

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@RescueLover wrote:

I enjoy listening to everyone’s opinions and theories. Especially because Nancy remaining missing is staying relevant.

The major news channels seem to have moved on because of what’s happening elsewhere.

I’m also wondering when Savannah comes back on April 9th if this will enrage the suspect and maybe get him to blow his cover.

My husband thinks it was a case of revenge. He hasn’t changed his belief since Day 1. Can’t imagine what Nancy would have done, so thinking the suspect wants Savannah’s attention.

I agree. @RescueLover Everyone’s opinions and hypotheses are valid. We don’t know what happened, so staying open‑minded and respecting each post is important.

Daludog · ‎02-05-2011

I enjoy reading all thoughts here. I wish I could put my thoughts here as well as others. I enjoy Chris and the interview room. I did find it interesting that both dates, 11 and 31 are wiccan holiday, or celebrations. Maybe its revenge against Annie and Tommaso. It could be revenge against Savannah also, in some of her interviews she came across as cold and harsh. But like OJ Simpson case, he's so nice it couldn't be him,! it could also be some involvement with Tommaso and his friends. I hope they find out who was involved for everyone.