Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 27,816
Registered: ‎10-03-2011

Re: Law Enforcement

[ Edited ]

To the mods...

 

Please remove whatever posts you deem necessary but thank you for letting us keep the thread going with regards to the original topic. 

Occasional Contributor
Posts: 15
Registered: ‎02-12-2026
@JeanLouiseFinch

Have you watched Megyn Kelly's video with LE Experts? Yesterday. I'm not someone who cares for her platform with that said her guests conversations especially conflicting reports made public from the Sheriff himself. To be clear Megyn Kelly not someone who would be on my subcribe list nothing against her there's plenty of choices for everyone. Thanks for mentioning her I would've missed the video if not for your help.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 27,816
Registered: ‎10-03-2011

@calmwaters wrote:
@JeanLouiseFinch

Have you watched Megyn Kelly's video with LE Experts? Yesterday. I'm not someone who cares for her platform with that said her guests conversations especially conflicting reports made public from the Sheriff himself. To be clear Megyn Kelly not someone who would be on my subcribe list nothing against her there's plenty of choices for everyone. Thanks for mentioning her I would've missed the video if not for your help.

Yes, @calmwaters, I have, and you're welcome.  I don't blame her for railing about the sheriff. Using his words she exposed his double talk. 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,553
Registered: ‎12-16-2013

I continue to pray that the case will be solved with a positive outcome.  The worst outcome would be no resolution for her family.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 37,364
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

@Tinkrbl44 wrote:

 

@Mersha 

 

Thank you for posting Maddow's education and qualifications.

 

I'm astounded how many people still think Faux News is giving accurate information. 

 

Even the CEO has said in court, under oath, that Fox is entertainment, NOT a news source  


@Tinkrbl44 Thanks for telling all of us who is telling the truth, as you always do.  We do wait to hear your opinion know!  

Honored Contributor
Posts: 48,702
Registered: ‎08-23-2010

@Sooner wrote:

@Tinkrbl44 wrote:

 

@Mersha 

 

Thank you for posting Maddow's education and qualifications.

 

I'm astounded how many people still think Faux News is giving accurate information. 

 

Even the CEO has said in court, under oath, that Fox is entertainment, NOT a news source  


@Tinkrbl44 Thanks for telling all of us who is telling the truth, as you always do.  We do wait to hear your opinion know!  


 

@Sooner 

 

I'm surprised people don't know this.  Or perhaps they just don't want to believe it?  It's well documented.  

 

 

Occasional Contributor
Posts: 15
Registered: ‎02-12-2026
I'm wide awake social media research into the weeds, and rabbit hole. Since watching the Megyn Kelly LE interviews sent Ashleigh Banfield twenty minutes ago about sheriff verbally attacking reporter named Brian and have no idea who this Brian is haven't watched the video will after leaving this message. In my entire life I have never witnessed anything like the handling of Nancy's Guthrie tragedy. I have no idea who, why or where? If she's alive or no longer here. Sadly time matters longer. Hopefully she's home sooner than later.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 27,816
Registered: ‎10-03-2011

@calmwaters - his name is Brian Entin and he's very good.  

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,999
Registered: ‎04-04-2015

@SamBrown wrote:

@Lakelife62 wrote:

@JeanLouiseFinch wrote:

@Isobel Archer - you might want to remove your speculation about the family.  A prior thread was deleted in part for speculative comments.  

Chris Nanos's comments are like riding a roller coaster.  One day, no one is cleared until an arrest is made.  The next day all family members are cleared.  🤦‍♀️

Just because he said they are cleared, I don't know if that means they're also cleared by the Feds.

 

 


Isn't this entire thread speculation? Speculation by posters? Speculation by media then reported back here?

I don't know how one can talk about a mysterious crime without speculation.


I don't understand.  No one is allowed to speculate on the boards?


For the record, there was no speculation in my comment.  I did not say nor do I particularly think, the family is involved.  I said that no one can be ruled out until they know who actually did it.  We have often been surprised to find out who either committed the crime or hired someone to do it.  When I said it was possible that that is the case here, that is not speculation, but a fact.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,543
Registered: ‎06-17-2015
Trying to wade through hoping for reliable updates.

I'm not getting all the fuss about Meghan Kelly. It's distracting.

I'm also not understanding why Rachel Maddow's credentials were listed.
Nobody was making a comparison.

This thread is about Nancy. Not a forum for who's who in the media.

On topic: I have seen nothing new about Nancy except for the gloves not containing and identifiable DNA

It seems everything is at a standstill.

I may have missed more since I don't spend a lot of time on TV.

This case just does not seem to be working out and hoping for an answer.

Never knowing will be the worst.
"" Compassion is a verb."-Thich Nhat Hanh