Reply
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,858
Registered: ‎01-04-2014

By what reasoning are you saying there was a delay in reporting? Do you know when they went to sleep and woke up? Or are you speculating...based on what? No class the next day. Not everyone starts their day early.


And no, even if there were a delay in reporting that is NOT circumstantial evidence of the murders. That's the crime at issue, not an imaginary abundance of drugs.

 

Pure speculation about drug use on anyone's part. 

How sad to want to tarnish and soil the victims of a crime.

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,221
Registered: ‎07-26-2019

   As far as the  room mates who survived and began texting  within minutes the one heard   strange noises and saw a  man in the home the old saying  " See Something , Say something " that is to  the  Police.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,608
Registered: ‎03-29-2020

@occasionalrain wrote:

Age doesn't matter. Even a child would go looking for a missing sibling.

These young women were friends, lived together and, not getting a response from any of the three didn't open their bedroom door, or so they claim.

What I suspect they are covering up is drugs. The lost hours before calling police were used to search out and dispose of their likely ample supply. Moreover, I suspect some/all were dealing. Cash would also need a secure place. They knew the police would do a search, inside and out.


 

You have a dirty, suspicious mind and you don't know what you're talking about.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,573
Registered: ‎05-09-2010

@occasionalrain wrote:

I am withholding judgement, as all Americans should, until  there is a fair trial and a verdict. 


@occasionalrain Well we all know that trials are not always fair, and the verdict is not always right.

 

OJ anyone?

Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else. Margaret Mead
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,366
Registered: ‎10-19-2012

@Puppy Lips wrote:

@occasionalrain wrote:

I am withholding judgement, as all Americans should, until  there is a fair trial and a verdict. 


@occasionalrain Well we all know that trials are not always fair, and the verdict is not always right.

 

OJ anyone?


 

 

Casey Anthony and Robert Blake anyone?

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,792
Registered: ‎05-21-2010

Re: Idaho Murders

[ Edited ]

@occasionalrain wrote:

I am withholding judgement, as all Americans should, until  there is a fair trial and a verdict. 

 

In the eyes of the law, the defendant is innocent until proved guilty. However all of America does not have to withhold judgement. Many believe that he is guilty of this crime. Those who are selected as jurors and take the oath to impartially consider only the evidence presented in court in reaching a true verdict are required to withhold judgement.