Re: Harry and Meghan Christmas card with kids

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@occasionalrain wrote:
Turning one's back on others is an insult. If they don't want to show their children's faces, then they shouldn't show their children at all. Meghan has had ample opportunities to succeed and hasn't. Her every endeavor has failed.

When she thinks it will benefit her, we will see them.

They are not the only ones that do this.

A lot of celebrities do it. It makes no sense.

They have every right to keep their children private. Showing us the back of their heads or their feet or whatever is not keeping them private.

In fact, it is the opposite. They are manipulating the public and using their own children for publicity.

lgfan · ‎10-19-2012

@Nonametoday wrote:
@Trinity11 wrote:
@goldensrbest wrote:
What ever this family does,or does not do some always find fault with it.
The reason is because I think talking about your family and writing books about their flaws is most people's worst nightmare. I used to defend both Harry and Meghan but after the book came out and I read it, I realized why many were upset with both of them. Many have a strong sense of loyalty to their family and are taught that family matters need to stay within the family. Publicizing your family's flaws and airing their dirty laundry is and always will be considered inappropriate @goldensrbest .

@Trinity11
I noticed not long after the book came out that their friend base began to diminish and not even Oprah has invited them to the parties she has given and it was said that Tyler had enough of her, the godfather of her children, on the red carpet when she tried to make it about her instead of him. I realized why it was, after the book, that people began to flee from them. If you talk about your family like that after they have done so much for you, how could you have any friends, because like you would stab them in the back as you did your family.

Hollywood is a very tight lipped community. They do not like people revealing their secrets. All you have to do is watch the many interviews that stars give and it is always wonderful to work with other actors, directors, etc. Harry and Megan betrayed that unwritten rule for loyalty. If they are capable of trashing their own family they are capable of trashing the Hollywood elite.

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@stevieb wrote:
@lgfan wrote:
@Sooner wrote:
@Isobel Archer wrote:
As noted, this is a corporate card - complete with reminding everyone that he is Prince Harry and they are the Duke and Duchess.

The probable reason for the pictured (but not pictured) kids is to remind everone that unlike the "other" royals, they don't have the security necessary to allow showing their kids' faces.

The victimhood never ends.
@Isobel Archer If lack of security was the message I don't think many people thought that. I think people thought "Oh here's those kids again in another picture where we can't see tham again. What's the point of that?"

They cannot show the kids but they had to show how wonderful they are as parents. Their kids running into their arms. They are one big happy family. I wonder where the nanny was during the photo shoot.
Not to mention the usually alerted (if not paid for) paps...?

Do you mean the same paps they were dodging when they were riding in the car in the documentary. The paps only they could see!

Or do you mean the speed chase through NYC. The only couple that can manage a chase of any kind in a city where traffic barely moves. @stevieb

lgfan · ‎10-19-2012

@manny2 wrote:
@stevieb wrote:
@lgfan wrote:
@Sooner wrote:
@Isobel Archer wrote:
As noted, this is a corporate card - complete with reminding everyone that he is Prince Harry and they are the Duke and Duchess.

The probable reason for the pictured (but not pictured) kids is to remind everone that unlike the "other" royals, they don't have the security necessary to allow showing their kids' faces.

The victimhood never ends.
@Isobel Archer If lack of security was the message I don't think many people thought that. I think people thought "Oh here's those kids again in another picture where we can't see tham again. What's the point of that?"

They cannot show the kids but they had to show how wonderful they are as parents. Their kids running into their arms. They are one big happy family. I wonder where the nanny was during the photo shoot.
Not to mention the usually alerted (if not paid for) paps...?
Do you mean the same paps they were dodging when they were riding in the car in the documentary. The paps only they could see!

Or do you mean the speed chase through NYC. The only couple that can manage a chase of any kind in a city where traffic barely moves.

Don't forget the numerous awards for God knows what that they receive. Didn't they get an award for just waking up and breathing?

beckyb1012 · ‎03-09-2010

Wales' just released their card for 2024

Image may contain Prince William Duke of Cambridge Face Head Person Photography Portrait Blouse Clothing and Pants

"Live frugally, but love extravagantly."

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@occasionalrain wrote:
They have staged chases of themselves. As to Meghans close relatives, other than her mother, none were invited to her wedding. Does anyone believe her father will get a Christmas card?

The one relative that wanted to come (her niece) she claims the royal family said no. Or was it the “firm” said no. Whatever…..

Now does that make sense? Is it reasonable?

She stood up Kate, and William, do you think she would allow anyone to stop that niece from coming????

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@Mersha wrote:
How on earth does anyone know what went on between Meghan and her father other than what you read somewhere?????????????????????????

Seriously, we all have no idea what is going on with anyone's personal relationships unless they tell us firsthand.

To make statements to the contrary is ridiculous.

You might want to go back to watch her. She told the world what her father did. She told the world what kind of relationship they have.

stevieb · ‎03-10-2010

@manny2 wrote:
@stevieb wrote:
@lgfan wrote:
@Sooner wrote:
@Isobel Archer wrote:
As noted, this is a corporate card - complete with reminding everyone that he is Prince Harry and they are the Duke and Duchess.

The probable reason for the pictured (but not pictured) kids is to remind everone that unlike the "other" royals, they don't have the security necessary to allow showing their kids' faces.

The victimhood never ends.
@Isobel Archer If lack of security was the message I don't think many people thought that. I think people thought "Oh here's those kids again in another picture where we can't see tham again. What's the point of that?"

They cannot show the kids but they had to show how wonderful they are as parents. Their kids running into their arms. They are one big happy family. I wonder where the nanny was during the photo shoot.
Not to mention the usually alerted (if not paid for) paps...?
Do you mean the same paps they were dodging when they were riding in the car in the documentary. The paps only they could see!

Or do you mean the speed chase through NYC. The only couple that can manage a chase of any kind in a city where traffic barely moves. @stevieb

The NYC 'chase', you know, the one refuted by everyone, was especially memorable. You know the one where they were so terrifed they were playing with their phones in the back seat...

In my pantry with my cupcakes...