Community Chat

[sunshine45]

you can NEVER be overdressed or overeducated - Oscar Wilde

[sunshine45]

---

kdgn wrote:

---

wildcat fan wrote:

I wish the lighting could have accentuated the dress a bit more.  It was difficult to see the details.

---

The original photo was intended to showcase the tables/settings for the dinner, not necessarily the dress itself.

---

...and there are lots of photos online which feature her and her husband at this event.....with different lighting. i posted just one of them.

[icezeus]

Stunning!!

[KingstonsMom]

---

@sunshine45 wrote:

you can NEVER be overdressed or overeducated - Oscar Wilde

---

The problem is, IMO she was underdressed for this particular occasion.

I'm sure Vera Wang designed this dress just for her and I think she could've designed it to cover a little more of her chest and it would have been more appropriate for this event, but still a beautiful dress.

You never saw Audrey Hepburn's boobs so exposed, since you're making that comparison.

[RainCityWoman]

I have to agree with some of the others: STUNNING! She's a striking, beautiful woman. Isn't Vera Wang also known for his fabulous wedding gowns?

[NoelSeven]

I have seen a lot of portraits and pix of royalty and well known others dressed for important occasions.

It has always surprised me that showing cleavage goes back for centuries.

[Lila Belle]

The dress was gorgeous from the back as well ! I also loved that ring.

She looked as stunning and appropriate as ever.

[tansy]

@KingstonsMom Audrey Hepburn didn't have any cleavage to show, at least early in her career.

[Lila Belle]

---

@icezeus wrote:

Stunning!!

---

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

And POTUS wasn't bad either !

[KingstonsMom]

---

@tansy wrote:

@KingstonsMom Audrey Hepburn didn't have any cleavage to show, at least early in her career.

---

LOL! That's true! But hopefully, you got my point!