Community Chat

[Maudelyn]

---

@JobGirl wrote:

I don't think anyone is blaming her I think people are saying she has had attitide in the past about certain things -and maybe after this her perspective may change-

its a harsh reality now prior it was her living in her insulated celebrity self absorbed world

At least thats what I am understanding by the posts about her

---

What was her attitude about certain things that needed changing?  This is a serious question, I know nothing about this girl except she sang with Jessie J and Niki Minaj on the song Bang Bang. And I think I've seen her in a cell phone commercial.

[Melania]

---

@JobGirl wrote:

I don't think anyone is blaming her I think people are saying she has had attitide in the past about certain things -and maybe after this her perspective may change-

its a harsh reality now prior it was her living in her insulated celebrity self absorbed world

At least thats what I am understanding by the posts about her

---

 In The Past??? You are taking opinions of the heartless here as the truth too??

You don't even see how messed up that is, do you? Wow, just wow!

And they are BLAMING her!!

[Noel7]

---

@Isobel Archer wrote:

---

@Noel7 wrote:

Numerous neurological studies have shown the human brain isn't fully developed until at least 25 years of age.

i don't understand those who are out for blood, blaming AG who is surely traumatized herself.

The only one to blame is the bomber and anyone who helped him kill and maim innocent young people and anyone else who was hurt.

---

But then the bomber isn't responsible either as he's only 22.

---

SHE isn't responsible because she wasn't part of the bombing.  HE was.  That's not rocket science.

[itiswhatitis]

I feel so bad for all involved.  Young folk were at this event with their parents.  It is said that Ariana Grande is taking this really hard.  I feel awful for everyone involved; including the emotional and mental health of those left in the aftermath.

[AngusandBuddhasMom]

---

@Isobel Archer wrote:

---

@JaneMarple wrote:

---

@JobGirl wrote:

I don't think anyone is blaming her I think people are saying she has had attitide in the past about certain things -and maybe after this her perspective may change-

its a harsh reality now prior it was her living in her insulated celebrity self absorbed world

At least thats what I am understanding by the posts about her

---

There is nothing to blame her for at all. I don't know why her attitude, prior reputation or brother has anything to do with this awful tragedy. The focus should be on the dead and injured, then the madmen and any group he represents. 

---

Ah, but that's the tricky part.  We can't necessarily believe he represents ANY group because that would be hateful. 

---

No what is hateful is that you are trying to sway the narrative towards a group that has nothing to do with it. 

[Maudelyn]

---

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

---

@Isobel Archer wrote:

---

@JaneMarple wrote:

---

@JobGirl wrote:

I don't think anyone is blaming her I think people are saying she has had attitide in the past about certain things -and maybe after this her perspective may change-

its a harsh reality now prior it was her living in her insulated celebrity self absorbed world

At least thats what I am understanding by the posts about her

---

There is nothing to blame her for at all. I don't know why her attitude, prior reputation or brother has anything to do with this awful tragedy. The focus should be on the dead and injured, then the madmen and any group he represents. 

---

Ah, but that's the tricky part.  We can't necessarily believe he represents ANY group because that would be hateful. 

---

No what is hateful is that you are trying to sway the narrative towards a group that has nothing to do with it. 

---

The bomber represents a group all right- a violent gang of criminals who are sick enough to latch onto the stupid ravings of lunatics. There are many such individuals.  Even in our own backyard.

[Noel7]

The fact that AG apparently didn't live up to the mature and calm response some have demanded of her is because she is still young and because she has been traumatized like many others there who survived.

[Isobel Archer]

---

@Noel7 wrote:

---

@Isobel Archer wrote:

---

@Noel7 wrote:

Numerous neurological studies have shown the human brain isn't fully developed until at least 25 years of age.

i don't understand those who are out for blood, blaming AG who is surely traumatized herself.

The only one to blame is the bomber and anyone who helped him kill and maim innocent young people and anyone else who was hurt.

---

But then the bomber isn't responsible either as he's only 22.

---

SHE isn't responsible because she wasn't part of the bombing.  HE was.  That's not rocket science.

---

Hello.  I never said, implied or otherwise mentioned that she was responsible in any way.

You are the one who brought up neurological studies  - to prove what point then exactly?

.

[Noel7]

---

@Isobel Archer wrote:

---

@Noel7 wrote:

---

@Isobel Archer wrote:

---

@Noel7 wrote:

Numerous neurological studies have shown the human brain isn't fully developed until at least 25 years of age.

i don't understand those who are out for blood, blaming AG who is surely traumatized herself.

The only one to blame is the bomber and anyone who helped him kill and maim innocent young people and anyone else who was hurt.

---

But then the bomber isn't responsible either as he's only 22.

---

SHE isn't responsible because she wasn't part of the bombing.  HE was.  That's not rocket science.

---

Hello.  I never said, implied or otherwise mentioned that she was responsible in any way.

You are the one who brought up neurological studies  - to prove what point then exactly?

.

---

SERIOUSLY?

I spelled it out for you above. See message 187.

[Isobel Archer]

---

@AngusandBuddhasMom wrote:

---

@Isobel Archer wrote:

---

@JaneMarple wrote:

---

@JobGirl wrote:

I don't think anyone is blaming her I think people are saying she has had attitide in the past about certain things -and maybe after this her perspective may change-

its a harsh reality now prior it was her living in her insulated celebrity self absorbed world

At least thats what I am understanding by the posts about her

---

There is nothing to blame her for at all. I don't know why her attitude, prior reputation or brother has anything to do with this awful tragedy. The focus should be on the dead and injured, then the madmen and any group he represents. 

---

Ah, but that's the tricky part.  We can't necessarily believe he represents ANY group because that would be hateful. 

---

No what is hateful is that you are trying to sway the narrative towards a group that has nothing to do with it. 

---

Actually, I'm not.  I'm pointing out that apparently the current correct thinking is that every person acts on their own and no group should be blamed.  Especially groups that take credit for it - because as you point out - they had nothing to do with it.

So therefore, it is absolutely impossible to ever prevent such occurrences because we can have absolutely no idea who might be inclined to perpetrate such violence - since it is an entirely individual act after all.