Re: CATHERINE, PRINCESS OF WALES HAS FINALLY BEEN ... - Page 14

hopi · ‎03-09-2010

Thought Harry & William had called the people running their royalty show the "Firm" or the "Institution". The Royals have not much say without them.

Pretty sure it is those people putting out these stories and photos as the cover-up and making Kate the scapegoat .

Running a narrative that everything is fine because without the royals .... they don't have a job.

This new affair rumor(which is an old rumor) has now been thrown out by regular folks saying Kate is not Diane and will not allow it to go on.

Either way all this lying to the media it just justifies and explains that Harry and Megan were not the awful people the Firm and Royal lovers made them out to be.

That being said has anyone seen their kids.. Don't they attend school.

Lakelife62 · ‎05-09-2023

@Mersha wrote:
@Lakelife62 wrote:
I'm out. The Dorsetts have arrived.
Not interested in 3 or 4 figments of someone's imagination talking to themselves as they pile on.
Have a nice Saturday, ladies.

@Lakelife62 Isn't that the truth.

I wonder if people are aware that the "other" board has everyone's IP address?

In any event, you have a great weekend as well.

Appears we have a quorum!!!!!
Like clockwork.
Thanks @Mersha.

manny2 · ‎05-24-2010

@KKJ wrote:
@Tinkrbl44 wrote:
@Cakers3 wrote:
@manny2 wrote:
@lgfan wrote:
One thing many people don't understand is that the RF is a tight lipped family. They do not want anyone within the family talking about them whether it is a good or bad thing. For Harry to tell Oprah in that interview that William felt trapped was a big breach of trust. It was not Harry's place to talk about that to anyone.
I agree @lgfan . Everybody has a right to tell their story. They don’t have a right to tell someone else’s story.

@manny2 Which is exactly what you are doing.

You can have the last word but I won't be seeing it.

@Cakers3

What people seem to conveniently miss is that when someone writes an autobiography or memoir it's not unusual to criticize situations and/or family. Happens all the time. If a person discussed is part of your family history, it's still "your story". And Harry isn't the first royal to author a book.
You don't seem to see the hypocrisy shown by H & M, who so fiercely protect the privacy of their two children but then Harry shares intimate details in his book "Waaagh!!" of texts between Kate and M, and even throwing his niece Charlotte into the fray. He crossed a line IMO by putting his niece--a little girl--into his whiny book for $$$. Despicable IMO.

You nailed it @KKJ

They are also raising the children in this wonderful California environment, yet both are estranged from their own family.

How does that work? How do they teach the importance of family relationships when they don’t model them.

Mersha · ‎03-10-2010

Explore bang head on desk GIFs

"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are." BF

Tinkrbl44 · ‎08-23-2010

@hopi wrote:
Thought Harry & William had called the people running their royalty show the "Firm" or the "Institution". The Royals have not much say without them.
Pretty sure it is those people putting out these stories and photos as the cover-up and making Kate the scapegoat .
Running a narrative that everything is fine because without the royals .... they don't have a job.
This new affair rumor(which is an old rumor) has now been thrown out by regular folks saying Kate is not Diane and will not allow it to go on.
Either way all this lying to the media it just justifies and explains that Harry and Megan were not the awful people the Firm and Royal lovers made them out to be.

That being said has anyone seen their kids.. Don't they attend school.

@hopi

Whose kids? If you're referring to H&M, California has different laws now in effect about taking pics of minors when they are with their "celebrity" parents.

If you do so without the parents' permission, the fines can be rather steep, and people press charges.