Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
-
Blogs & Forums
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
I caught the final presentation on tonight with Lisa and again, I was just baffled on how vague they both were when they were addressing what it will do on the rest of the face (excluding the eyes where they definitely made definitive claims) Both talked about texture and radiance (not wrinkles or fine lines) but somehow I think those ordering it are sure expecting a whole lot more than just improved texture and radiance.
I seriously hope for those who did make the investment that this Tria performs far better on the remaining parts of the face than the elusive comments implied. I just don't get why they seemed to alter expectations after discussing the eye area. And it was so obvious. Think I caught at least 3 or 4 presentations throughout the day and it was the same every time.
One would think if it can make that much difference in the eye area then it also can for the rest of the face yet the terminology distinctly changed when referencing the remainder of the face by both the vendor and the hosts. Very confusing as I really didn't know, if I bought it, what I should expect from this Tria.
I am the OP. I caught almost all of the initial presentation and some of the final one. The final one was not GREAT, but it was light years BETTER than the first one. Either they read this thread or figured out themselves they needed to improve it.
I think they are being extra careful on what the FDA has allowed them to say. I still think more explanation of fractional laser and better photos were needed. There are some remarkable photos if you just do a google search. Yes, they are physician office photos, but they give you a better idea.
Hyacinth 
I caught the final presentation on tonight with Lisa and again, I was just baffled on how vague they both were when they were addressing what it will do on the rest of the face (excluding the eyes where they definitely made definitive claims) Both talked about texture and radiance (not wrinkles or fine lines) but somehow I think those ordering it are sure expecting a whole lot more than just improved texture and radiance.
I seriously hope for those who did make the investment that this Tria performs far better on the remaining parts of the face than the elusive comments implied. I just don't get why they seemed to alter expectations after discussing the eye area. And it was so obvious. Think I caught at least 3 or 4 presentations throughout the day and it was the same every time.
One would think if it can make that much difference in the eye area then it also can for the rest of the face yet the terminology distinctly changed when referencing the remainder of the face by both the vendor and the hosts. Very confusing as I really didn't know, if I bought it, what I should expect from this Tria.
I am the OP. I caught almost all of the initial presentation and some of the final one. The final one was not GREAT, but it was light years BETTER than the first one. Either they read this thread or figured out themselves they needed to improve it.
I think they are being extra careful on what the FDA has allowed them to say. I still think more explanation of fractional laser and better photos were needed. There are some remarkable photos if you just do a google search. Yes, they are physician office photos, but they give you a better idea.
Hyacinth
Agree, the last was far better than the launch. I keep saying that if I hadn't done resarch and read reviews and already decided I was going to give it a go, I wouldn't have even been tempted by that initial presentation and those "huh?" before and after pics.
The pics on the Tria Beauty site are far better. I think they're the same people, the same photos, but for some reason they really looked so UNDERwhelming on TV.
I'm surprised anybody bought this if they'd only seen the show. There are reports/reviews of improvements in areas that they couldn't mention on air (that pesky FDA!). Too bad, because there are so many happy users out there. Well, the word will spread. I hate that someone might not try something if there's a possibility they would be really happy with the results, just based on a lackluster presentation.
I was going to say the Q (and Tria) kind of dropped the ball on this one, but they sold out over 10,000 units. Apparently everybody doesn't think like I do -- is that possible? :-)
Footer Navigation and Information
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Manage Your Account
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Get More with QCard®
Enjoy 12+ VIP Savings Events a year (& more!).
Work with Us
Stay Connected
Download Our QVC Apps
This is Shopping Brought to Life.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2025 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788