Beauty

Quick links
Turn on suggestions Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Reply
Contributor
valleygirl22
Posts: 40
Registered: ‎10-06-2010

NuFace vs. LightStim Mini

[ Edited ]

‎03-08-2014 05:15 PM - edited ‎01-22-2017 03:14 AM

 

Smiley Happy

Report Inappropriate Content
Message 1 of 3 (1,627 Views)
Labels:
Reply
0 Hearts
Super Contributor
MarenSeattle
Posts: 4,655
Registered: ‎10-19-2013

Re: NuFace vs. LightStim Mini

‎03-08-2014 08:44 PM

I have the mini, too, and I got so tired of how long it was taking for a treatment (I wanted to cover my entire face!) So on a whim I just picked up the iLLumask for $30 @ Walgreen's so I could at least tell myself I was doing 'infrared therapy'. I have no idea if it's working or not, but I'll hang in for the 30 days.

I also have the NuFace (which I hate the time that takes, too!). For me, I feel they're addressing two entirely different issues -- the LightStim is for wrinkles (stimulates collagen), the NuFace is for toning facial muscles. I'm tempted to swap it out for SCC's Egg so I could cut the time in half.

The improvement I've seen from both is subtle, slow, and probably noticeable to no one but me. I slacked for about a week and as is often the case when we STOP using/taking something, we realize that we were benefitting from it.

Report Inappropriate Content
Message 2 of 3 (1,627 Views)
Reply
0 Hearts
Super Contributor
Rochester Shopper
Posts: 312
Registered: ‎07-20-2011

Re: NuFace vs. LightStim Mini

‎03-08-2014 09:03 PM

Hi Valleygirl22,

I have been using the full-size LS for a few years (actually, I have two that I use, one for each hand). I found it lightened my brown age spots and freckles.

Report Inappropriate Content
Message 3 of 3 (1,627 Views)
Reply
0 Hearts