Re: Story of a Miracle Baby

raven-blackbird · ‎06-03-2010

On 2/13/2014 Dagna said:
On 2/13/2014 Lila Belle said:
That's really gross. Dagna.

What part isn't true?

it's actually not gross.........may be uncomfortable for some, but it's not gross and it does cause someone pause, as to what's the difference......................................raven

We're not in Kansas anymore ToTo

brii · ‎06-20-2010

Nothing more powerful than the sense of touch and sound.

terrier3 · ‎03-10-2010

On 2/13/2014 blackbirdraven said:
On 2/13/2014 Dagna said:
On 2/13/2014 Lila Belle said:
That's really gross. Dagna.

What part isn't true?

it's actually not gross.........may be uncomfortable for some, but it's not gross and it does cause someone pause, as to what's the difference......................................raven

Your agenda never seems to take into consideration the freedom of others to make what they believe is the best decisions for their families.

I didn't bring up TX - the fanatics did.

My post was in response to a "wish" that the same thing could have been done in TX as in the case of the Canadian brain dead mom (who - BTW - was in a different condition than the TX mom).

terrier3 · ‎03-10-2010

On 2/13/2014 Dagna said:

This is a joyful thread and I don't want to spoil it, but I think her issue is that seeing a baby - born at 21 weeks - recognize her mother is very threatening for those who want to insist that it's not even really a baby if the mother doesn't want it. There really are two people not just one involved.

This "joyous" thread was started to say that all babies have a chance at a full healthy life if they are born at 20 weeks.

That is just not true.

Also, I don't know how you assume you know anyone else's motivations or theories on life if they don't or can't carry a child full term.

pinkskates4 · ‎03-10-2010

On 2/13/2014 terrier3 said:
On 2/13/2014 Dagna said:
This is a joyful thread and I don't want to spoil it, but I think her issue is that seeing a baby - born at 21 weeks - recognize her mother is very threatening for those who want to insist that it's not even really a baby if the mother doesn't want it. There really are two people not just one involved.

This "joyous" thread was started to say that all babies have a chance at a full healthy life if they are born at 20 weeks.

That is just not true.

Also, I don't know how you assume you know anyone else's motivations or theories on life if they don't or can't carry a child full term.

Whatever her motiviation, if this mother had aborted this baby - who clearly had the ability to recognize her - there certainly wouldn't have been the joyful outcome we are seeing.

And that would apparently be fine with many.

terrier3 · ‎03-10-2010

On 2/13/2014 Dagna said:
On 2/13/2014 terrier3 said:
On 2/13/2014 Dagna said:
This is a joyful thread and I don't want to spoil it, but I think her issue is that seeing a baby - born at 21 weeks - recognize her mother is very threatening for those who want to insist that it's not even really a baby if the mother doesn't want it. There really are two people not just one involved.

This "joyous" thread was started to say that all babies have a chance at a full healthy life if they are born at 20 weeks.

That is just not true.

Also, I don't know how you assume you know anyone else's motivations or theories on life if they don't or can't carry a child full term.

Whatever her motiviation, if this mother had aborted this baby - who clearly had the ability to recognize her - there certainly wouldn't have been the joyful outcome we are seeing.

And that would apparently be fine with many.