Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
03-01-2016 11:25 PM
03-01-2016 11:26 PM
I'm in the hospitality business. The Mariott did a lot of things wrong. They're supposed to protect the privacy of their guests...maybe even more so, when that guest is a celebrity.
However, $75 million is an overblown amount. I'm sure it will be negotiated down quite a bit.
03-01-2016 11:30 PM
@SydneyH wrote:Thank you. She's still working but needs $75 million? Gimme a break, lol.
I don't think it's about what she needs. It's about what she's owed, due to the hotel's negligence in protecting her privacy.
I have no doubt that they're guilty, and they'll be paying her some amount. Maybe not $75 million, but I'll bet it will be in the 7 figure range.
03-01-2016 11:37 PM
Even if she wins, (which I hope that she does) Marriott will appeal it.
It will be years before she sees a dime of any monies that she is awarded.
03-01-2016 11:38 PM
@ritasNo1Fan wrote:Marriott did not film this woman. A stalker filmed this woman. $0.00 to Andrews from Marriott.
OMG!!! .... are you for real?
03-01-2016 11:42 PM
03-01-2016 11:42 PM
@Jackaranda wrote:Why should the Marriott pay? He asked to have a room next to her (his words) and they honored that request. We get rooms next to each other all the time. The creep is the only one responsible. I definitely feel bad for her and I know she suffered but the hotel did nothing wrong. I am glad they didn't settle and went to court.
Uh ..... He's a STALKER and they didn't follow their own security protocols to protect her. That's why.
03-01-2016 11:52 PM
@hopi wrote:
@Lila Belle wrote:
Millions and millions of people saw her naked due to the negligence of MarriotMillions of people saw her naked because of youtube
@hopi .... look at it this way ... millions of people saw her naked because of the lack of security at the Marriott ... yes, the SOB that took the video was to blame BUT, he never would have able to take the video if the Marriott had better security .. how would you feel if it was you or your daughter!!!!
03-01-2016 11:53 PM
@January121 wrote:
@Jackaranda wrote:Marriott could of settled. They didn't. They are taking a stand. Will be interesting to see how it turns out.....
@Nancy Drew .... thank God you are not on the jury!!!!!
---------
oh jeez, get a grip....
03-01-2016 11:56 PM
@KALLIE wrote:
@Graydoxiechick wrote:how was the hotel suppose to know he was a stalker? It was only the creeps fault.
It wouldn't. Suing for 75 million is RIDICULOUS!
Why is it ridiculous? Haven't you ever heard of punitive damages?
Anyone can sue for any amount ..... it'll be interesting to see what the JURY thinks.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788