Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,586
Registered: ‎01-13-2012

Has anyone used this newest additional screening for breast cancer?  It is AI and not covered by insurance (yet) but it's only $40 right now.  It is simply an extra reading after the radiologist reads. I did it in addition to my regular mammo and ultrasound screening for extra peace of mind.  Going on 9 years since my lumpectomy...

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,694
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

It was offered to me when I made my appointment recently. I turned it down.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,751
Registered: ‎01-27-2014

@bargainsgirl this is a very smart thing to do...there is substantial medical evidence that AI is far better than humans at catching cancer from mammograms. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 14,898
Registered: ‎03-19-2010

I have dense, lumpy breasts.  I had a biopsy several years ago for something THEY found, not me, and the ultrasound was inconclusive.  Fibroadenoma is what the doctor called it and he said basically, that means you have lumpy breasts.  You can lessen the effect by giving up caffeine (which would include chocolate) and I told him I would live with it.  They aren't painful.  

 

Last year I decided to go for the 3D mammogram.  I'll stick with that for the time being.  

 

I've never done self exams since I have lumpy breasts.  My gyno told me last year, after all this time, that if the lump moves, it's okay; if it doesn't move, I should consider it suspicious.  

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,847
Registered: ‎09-01-2010

My facility does 3D mammograms on everyone.  

Regular Contributor
Posts: 168
Registered: ‎01-14-2011

Yes, I paid the $40.00 and had AI give the xray another look!  Worth it.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,669
Registered: ‎10-09-2023

I would like to think the radiologist reading the scans is more reliable than AI. If I need a second opinion I am still not picking AI. I will like another real human reading it.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,751
Registered: ‎01-27-2014

@SaveTheTurtles @Unfortunately that's just not true. AI is much better than human radiologists. It's been evaluated and studied extensively. When AI is used, it's after a human radiologist has done their job....so both are used. Everyone should insist on AI....and not just for breasts. Your health is much better with AI as part of the check in reading and evaluating your clinical data.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,727
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

What does EBCS stand for?

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,452
Registered: ‎06-02-2010

@Ainhisg - The use here means Early Breast Cancers