Wellness

[sfnative]

---

@Mom2Dogs wrote:

@sfnative Thanks for the remarks..and I recall another post you made that did not go over well....now is in the main stream news.

---

@Mom2Dogs 

Hi momtodogs,

Yes, a lot of my stuff doesn't go over well, because I'm either ahead of the curve or above heads.

Due to my professional experience, I'm on the receiving end of many scientific and clinical email feeds, which are most likely the same ones the better news networks receive.  The "Best" new networks,  I mean "news" rather than constant "commentary," will include newsworthy items from some of these emails, but first must be vetted by their departmental gurus, which then must rough out the material, which then must be forwarded to a script writer, and so on, before you might view it on air or hear it on the radio.  And all of this vice me having read it, then turned around and placed it here.  That's why people will be disinclined to read my pieces and consider them hoey, whereas the same material 2 days later on the news is fine. 

[Mom2Dogs]

@sfnative so, are you willing/able to name the news sources? I understand if you don't.

I said to my husband yesterday....see I told you so...I read about the virus potential origin several months ago....but the discussion did not last long, ha, ha!

[twentysixteen]

---

@Mom2Dogs wrote:

@sfnative so, are you willing/able to name the news sources? I understand if you don't.

I said to my husband yesterday....see I told you so...I read about the virus potential origin several months ago....but the discussion did not last long, ha, ha!

---

@Mom2Dogs 

Posters have told you several times the conspiracy theory you post about "the origin" in the lab is wrong maybe you missed them.

Like this by @pitdakota.

---

@pitdakota wrote:

For those that are interested in research science based articles, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) has published an article about the genome sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 (otherwise known as the 2019 novel coronavirus) genome.

Very interesting data.  And no, the virus did not come from a lab.  But they have identified 3 different strains, which they have labeled A, B, and C.  

The research identifies the strain that has impacted the New York area came from Europe.

Here is a link to the article for those interested:

https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117 

2 other groups also typed the genome and arrived at the same conclusion independently:

1. The Genome Technology Center at NYU Langone Health

2. Ichan School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai

If anyone is interested in reading about their work, you can google those groups and read the information.

---

[twentysixteen]

@Mom2Dogs 

Another of @pitdakota posts from the same Wellness thread.

---

@pitdakota wrote:

---

@MorningLover wrote:

First paragraph from this Wall Street Journal report: China has had this specific coronavirus in its Wuhan lab for 7-years.

The Bats Behind the Pandemic: From Ebola to Covid-19, many of the deadliest viruses to emerge in recent years have the same animal source.

RaTG13 is the name, rank and serial number of an individual horseshoe bat of the species Rhinolophus affinis, or rather of a

of its feces collected in 2013 in a cave in Yunnan, China. The sample was collected by hazmat-clad scientists from the Institute of Virology in Wuhan that year. Stored away and forgotten until January this year, the sample from the horseshoe bat contains the virus that causes Covid-19.

`~ wsj

---

_________________________________________________

@MorningLover, I will post the entire article here so that people can read for themselves.  The author goes on to discuss at great length how they search for and study various viruses they find out there trying to find host populations for various viruses we already know about.  

It does appear that you are trying to imply a totally different scenario here that they had the virus in this lab and had something to do with its release. Forgive me if I am incorrect, but it is just a little odd you left the major context of the author's article out from your post. 

But notice this is not what the author is saying in this article at all.  Furthermore, there are literally thousands of virus hunters all over the world.  I think there is even a show or program about virus hunters and what they do. 

You may want to find that show and watch it.  It is really interesting as to how they go in caves all over the world and collect specimens to bring back to find the host reservoir for diseases such as Ebola, etc.  And yes, they bring those samples back to labs in all different countries to find the host for viruses responsible for large outbreaks or epidemics that have occurred.  

Here is the link to the entire article:

http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/bats-behind-the-pandemic/ 

Please note his last several paragraphs  " In a paper published in February last year, Patrick Woo and colleagues at Hong Kong University surveyed the coronaviruses found in bats and came to a prescient conclusion: “Bat–animal and bat–human interactions, such as the presence of live bats in wildlife wet markets and restaurants in Southern China, are important for interspecies transmission of [coronaviruses] and may lead to devastating global outbreaks.”
We had fair warning with Ebola, Hendra, Nipah, MERS and SARS, and the Yunnan cave discovery in 2013 should have sounded a loud alarm. Even when this pandemic is over, others are possible. Bats live for up to 30 years and don’t seem to suffer much in the way of symptoms from coronaviruses, so bat number RaTG13 may well still be alive."

So notice they are still looking for bat RaTG13 to see if it is the host resevoir for this novel 2019 coronavirus  (SARS-CoV-2).

And a big ****** in the view of this virus being manipulated in the lab, is that is does not work with computer programming.  Any sequencing in which they manipulate the genetic sequencing of any virus, or anything else is it has to have a programming code that works on computer models.  Or how else would they replicate it?    This genome does not replicate with computer programming.  Any coder out there understands that process. 

---

[twentysixteen]

Pitdakota's & morning lover's posts are from this thread & the whole article they talk about is posted there you can read it all at this link.

Covid-19 When Did It Really Start

https://community.qvc.com/t5/Wellness/Covid-19-When-Did-It-Really-Start/td-p/6119368/page/6

@Drythe & @Porcelain & @KarenQVC 

& @bikerbabe 

@Marp & @suzyQ3 

are informed on these topics as well. 

hope that helps!

[suzyQ3]

---

@sfnative wrote:

---

@Mom2Dogs wrote:

@sfnative Thanks for the remarks..and I recall another post you made that did not go over well....now is in the main stream news.

---

@Mom2Dogs 

Hi momtodogs,

Yes, a lot of my stuff doesn't go over well, because I'm either ahead of the curve or above heads.

Due to my professional experience, I'm on the receiving end of many scientific and clinical email feeds, which are most likely the same ones the better news networks receive.  The "Best" new networks,  I mean "news" rather than constant "commentary," will include newsworthy items from some of these emails, but first must be vetted by their departmental gurus, which then must rough out the material, which then must be forwarded to a script writer, and so on, before you might view it on air or hear it on the radio.  And all of this vice me having read it, then turned around and placed it here.  That's why people will be disinclined to read my pieces and consider them hoey, whereas the same material 2 days later on the news is fine. 

---

@sfnative, yes, I'm sure that is why.

SMH.

[MorningLover]

@twentysixteen   While you copied part of my post from another thread... You didn't copy my response below. Everything in the article is factual. Very interesting!

 Pitdakota wrote: It does appear that you are trying to imply a totally different scenario here that they had the virus in this lab and had something to do with its release. Forgive me if I am incorrect, but it is just a little odd you left the major context of the author's article out from your post. 

No pitdakota not my intention at all.  I was only able to post what I did because of a pay wall on wsj. Someone else might like to read it, so I posted it. I wasn't impling a different scenario....

Thanks for the full article, I'll read it closely later....

Wall Street Journal 

>RaTG13 is the name, rank and serial number of an individual horseshoe bat of the species Rhinolophus affinis, or rather of a sample of its feces collected in 2013 in a cave in Yunnan, China. The sample was collected by hazmat-clad scientists from the Institute of Virology in Wuhan that year. Stored away and forgotten until January this year, the sample from the horseshoe bat contains the virus that causes Covid-19.

The scientists were mostly sampling a very similar species with slightly shorter wings, called Rhinolophus sinicus, in a successful search for the origin of the virus responsible for the SARS epidemic of 2002-03. That search had alarming implications, which were largely ignored.

In S*itou Cave, south of Kunming, the capital of Yunnan, they found viruses in the bats’ droppings and a-nal swabs that were more similar to human SARS than anything found in palm civets, the small mammals that until then were presumed to be the source of human infection. Back in the laboratory, they found that one of the viruses from bat droppings, called WIV1, could thrive in monkey and human cells specially engineered to activate the gene for ACE2 receptors, the lock to which a coronavirus’s spike protein can fit as a key. This suggested that people could catch SARS directly from a bat dropping.

Then in 2016, Ralph Baric and colleagues at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill showed that the same bat virus could infect live mice that had been engineered to express the human gene for the ACE2 receptor. The virus was “poised for human emergence,” as the title of Dr. Baric’s paper put it.

When Covid-19 broke out, attention focused on pangolins, mammals often called scaly anteaters. Early analyses of the pangolin version of the virus seemed to indicate it was even more closely related to the human version than the RaTG13 bat sample was. The illegal pangolin trade for traditional Chinese medicine brings people into contact with sick animals. Just over a year ago, 21 live Malayan pangolins destined for sale in China were intercepted by anti-smuggling officers in Guangdong. Despite the best efforts of a local wildlife rescue center, 16 died with swollen, flooded lungs, rich in coronaviruses.

The role of pangolins in the spread of Sars-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, remains unclear. A closer look at more of the Sars-CoV-2 genome, published last week by Maciej Boni at Penn State University and David Robertson at Glasgow University, together with Chinese and European colleagues, finds that human versions of the virus are more closely related to the RaTG13 horseshoe bat sample from the cave than they are to the known pangolin versions. It is not yet possible to tell whether the virus went from bat to pangolin to people, or from bat to pangolin and bat to people in parallel. 

Significantly, the same analysis shows that the most recent common ancestor of the human virus and the RaTG13 virus lived at least 40 years ago. So it is unlikely that the cave in Yunnan (a thousand miles from Wuhan) is where the first infection happened or that the culprit bat was taken from that cave to Wuhan to be eaten or experimented on.

Rather, it is probable that somewhere much closer to Wuhan, there is another colony of bats carrying the same kind of virus. Unless other evidence emerges, it thus looks like a horrible coincidence that China’s Institute of Virology, a high-security laboratory where human cells were being experimentally infected with bat viruses, happens to be in Wuhan, the origin of today’s pandemic. 

Bats are sold in markets and supplied directly to restaurants throughout China and southeast Asia, but no direct evidence of their sale in Wuhan’s wet market has come to light. Also, horseshoe bats, which are much smaller than the tastier fruit bats, are generally not among the species eaten. The significance of the Yunnan cave sample is that it shows the bat virus didn’t need to recombine with viruses in other species in a market to be infectious to people. The role of the wet markets may be that other animals get infected there and produce much higher loads of virus than the bats would, amplifying the infection.

All over Asia and Africa human beings encounter horseshoe bats, any one of which could be carrying a virus that could start an epidemic if amplified in a market or similar setting. Bats have supplied most of the dangerous new diseases of the past two decades. The natural reservoir of rabies is in bats, especially in the Americas. Ebola, Marburg and other highly dangerous viruses come from bats, mainly in Africa. The Hendra and Nipah viruses are caught from fruit bats and have caused lethal but small outbreaks in south Asia and Australia. And most coronaviruses seem to originate in bats, including SARS and MERS, a frequently fatal illness that people in the Middle East began catching from camels in 2012, the camels having picked it up from bats.

There are good reasons why bats spread so many viruses. Bats are long-lived mammals, like us, and live in large crowds, like us—ideal for spreading respiratory infections in particular. One bat roost in Texas houses 20 million bats at certain times of year, a concentration of mammals paralleled only by people in cities. There are lots of different species—one-quarter of all mammal species are bats—so they have lots of different viruses. And they fly, carrying diseases long distances, allowing viruses to indulge in “host-shifting” between bat species. This especially suits viruses that can “recombine” with related strains, like coronaviruses.

It is not yet clear why horseshoe bats, in particular, are so infested with coronaviruses. These are average-size bats, distinguished by large, pointed ears and weird little sonar dishes known as nose-leafs, the outer part of which are often shaped like horseshoes. There are at least 100 species, many of which look very alike. Absent from the Americas, they are found all over the tropics of the Old World and in some warm temperate regions. They seem to be fond of living in caves and gathering in large aggregations. 

In a paper published in February last year, Patrick Woo and colleagues at Hong Kong University surveyed the coronaviruses found in bats and came to a prescient conclusion: “Bat–animal and bat–human interactions, such as the presence of live bats in wildlife wet markets and restaurants in Southern China, are important for interspecies transmission of [coronaviruses] and may lead to devastating global outbreaks.”

We had fair warning with Ebola, Hendra, Nipah, MERS and SARS, and the Yunnan cave discovery in 2013 should have sounded a loud alarm. Even when this pandemic is over, others are possible. Bats live for up to 30 years and don’t seem to suffer much in the way of symptoms from coronaviruses, so bat number RaTG13 may well still be alive.