@eadu4 wrote:
Simply getting the vaccine does not prevent someone from getting or spreading COVID... So every vaccinated person can still infect dozens of people each day.
Vac·cine | vakˈsēn | noun | a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease. The "covid vaccine" is NOT a vaccine based on this definition. This "vaccine" is an experimental-emergency drug with absolutely no properties of the virus and it. There is a very large difference between other vaccines and this one. The others have undergone rigorous testing and MANY years of studies on side effects. So that comparison is apples and oranges And NO ONE knows the long term affects. The first 24 to 48 hours after your "jab" isn't indicitive of anything. The vaccine is NOT a cure. They openly have said they do not know what impact it will have on any diseases or issues you currently have or how it will eventually interact with any medication you are presently on.
A recent study by the Cleveland Clinic analyzing more than 50,000 of its employees over five months found that those who had been infected with COVID-19 did not benefit from vaccinations. During the study, researchers found that not a single person who had been previously infected with the virus became ill. Considering how many people are suspected of having been exposed but not shown any symptoms this is outstanding news. It means far more of the population right now has a string defense against Covid 19 that we thought
The human body has been reacting to viruses for a VERY long time and it creates defenses against them when exposed. True, the length and strength of this defense is unknown at this time but that's just because it hasn't been around that long. The important thing here though is that this shows the human body CAN develop just as strong (or stronger) a defense by actually having been exposed to the virus as by receiving the vaccine.
There is no peer-reviewed, major medical publication that states that paper or cloth masks are effective against the spread of viruses. The CDC and NIOSH themselves said exactly that in 2018 literature supporting the use of N95 or better protection. Surgical masks are to prevent hairs, epithelia and spittle from getting into an OPEN WOUND. They are supposed to be disposed of, like gloves, after each patient encounter. FYI the reason you saw pictures of asian countries wearing masks prior to covid19 had absolutely zero to do with the Flu. The entire reason they wore masks is because of how terrible their air quality is on an almost daily basis due to pollution.
The mask, while I am sure was better than nothing, in reality did nothing to protect people from the virus, and Fauci’s emails confirmed this. However, it gave people a feeling of safety, which from a bird eyes point of view, was probably more important than the safety from the virus itself. It gave people security when all the talk was doom and gloom. It allowed them to step into the outside without full panic.
The masks most people wear are particle masks and in no way prevent anyone from getting Covid. If the masks were so effective in trapping this deadly virus, then why were there no guidelines on how to properly dispose them without spreading the infection?
Bottom line, they are seeing "reactions" weeks, months after this vaccine in perfectly healthy young people. Why would you want to put an experimental vaccine into a perfectly healthy young person who statistically we now know has a greater chance of being struck by lightning than dying from this? Or even having severe issues? 85% fo those who died were over 65 with 2 or more exisiting co-morbiities. Chances are very high these young people's bodies have performed as nature intended and have a healthy robust immune system that fights this virus off. In past years young and healthy people died from the common flu. They have not died from this virus, why? It has the lethality to kill the elderly and sick, not the young and healthy. We know obese, diabetic, lung conditions and immune compromised are at the highest risk. Anyone willing to put an emergency, experimental drug into anyone 20 or younger where there is zero knowledge of how it will effect their perfectly healthy systems and those that have not gone through puberty needs to ask their doctors if they should get it. Being "required" to have it is not why you should get it. Being a "patriotic act", is no reason to get it . The only reason to get vaccinated is if YOU are at risk, if YOU fall into the highest risk catagory. It is a medical decision that should be left to each individual's doctors. And yes to some this is a "poison". I should know. I did wind up with a lasting issue FROM the vaccine. I was perfectly healthy before, now not so much.
@eadu4
I type quite a few long posts, as is this one you posted. However, I have never used Cut/Paste in any of my posts. Guess I prefer using my own words, along with how I view things.
What seems to me to a post with the word "vaccine" broken down into a part of speech. I see that primarily in a dictionary, not in someone's own thoughts, when written.
My view of the vaccine is pretty simple. It does protect me and also passing on a deadly form of this virus. Keep me or others from contracting it? No! Keeping myself and others from possibly dying from it? Yes!
hckynut(john)
Blogs & Forums
