Vionic TSV--Frumpy - Page 3

Unhooked42 · ‎07-26-2011

They are a qvc exclusive which always means cheaper to me. They are ugly, the special values are always the ugliest shoes.

rms1954 · ‎06-06-2019

Gripe of the day. Seems as though you're a bit upbeat and positive today

Pickypoo16 · ‎03-29-2015

Yes these look like those old moccasin style loafers my grandmother used to wear and they have so many cute styles why would they make something so elderly looking.?

jpie · ‎06-21-2010

I have many styles and pairs of Vionics that I have purchased through the years (dating back to when they were called Orthoheels).

I agree with others here that it is an almond-shaped toe box. I do like the metallic choices. The price to me seems reasonable for well-constructed shoes. I am not buying these only because I prefer the construction of a traditional loafer. These look like a driving shoe to me. Perhaps a cross between a driving shoe and a slipper? I will say that I have thought about it, but I have too many other expenses on this current charge cycle!

If you purchased these I hope they are perfect in every way! I will be reading the reviews as soon as they are posted.

Kachina624 · ‎03-10-2010

To be truly supportive, a shoe needs more than a molded footbed. These look about as mushy and unsupportive as a shoe can be. Of course this is the company that claims a flip flop is supportive. Not!

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment

tropics21 · ‎05-02-2010

yes those are the ones, and considering they were a few dollars more than these frumpy shoes, and had a chain and were suede, my other beef is that they are asking way way too much money for these shoes. Mocassins are all over the place for alot less, leather, and more attractive, and as far as there so called arch support, that has not worked out either.