Today's Special Value

[Kat 213]

@PINKdogWOOD I would love to see a nice camo as well.  And i could not believe my eyes when I was watching last night.  Advance Orders on a TSV???  Wow.  Maybe they were expecting them to be in stock for today but they were delayed.

[Kat 213]

@Sweet_Serenity I have some of those as well and you're right, they do hold up well.

[QueenDanceALot]

---

@Kat 213 wrote:

 Sorry, here's what they look like.  They may be new, they're called "Look at Me Now" seamless leggings.

---

Honestly, I think they should be called "Avert Your Eyes" leggings.

[RetRN]

I will not be ordering.

[Krimpette]

$45 for leggings?????????????  Not for me!

[MoJoV]

Way overpriced and look awful on everyone.  The Spanx woman this morning with Jennifer was shaking her can at the camera.  Claaaassy. Ugh. 

[ROMARY]

By gosh, I like them!   I've been thinking that they look good on everyone, so far.  Nothing shows through, etc.  And I like where the waist is positioned. Thinking about ordering the grey.

[ROMARY]

They haven't been mentioning the Spandex content.  Thanks for the info, poster.  6%, which would mean that they aren't too-too tight and restrictive-feeling.

[MomCat]

I fell out with this line long ago.  Not a good fit!  Don't trust this sizing, and there is no way they are worth that price.  Not getting the Spanx hype. 

[software]

Amy said if they are too long you can ruche at the hip or at the ankle.    She mentioned that Lori said ruching at the ankle is fashionable.

I have no opinion either way, just repeating what I heard in the presentation

---

@Biftu wrote:

Are these too long for petites?  The inseam says 22 1/2 - 24" but they look like a good length on the very tall models.  

---