Reply
New Member
Posts: 2
Registered: ‎08-11-2014

Please ask more designers for talls in pants. Isaac has some pants I would love if they came in talls.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,815
Registered: ‎03-09-2010
I agree. It's not right that they always seem to offer a petite, regular and also sizes up to 3X, but seem to forget all about those of us that are tall. I for one, would like to see talls start at a 34" inseam. When they are too long pants can be hemmed. When they're not long enough, you can't just add fabric.
Highlighted
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,286
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Add me to the call for more pants in a TALL option; 34 inches would be ideal.

If Banana Republic, Gap and other retailers can routinely offer a range of sizes, Q why can't you? Every time there's a TALL in Linea it sprouts wings and takes flight!!

Fortēs fortūna adjuvat
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,293
Registered: ‎08-14-2013

Susan Graver's pants used to come in Tall but recently she's only introduced ones that are in either regular or petite. I've contacted her on her FB page about it.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,702
Registered: ‎08-22-2013

Talls and smalls always get the short end of it, I don't see that changing.

Super Contributor
Posts: 391
Registered: ‎06-19-2011

Need more tall pants for sure! I won't buy any pants from the Q unless they come with a 34" inseam.

Oh, and most tall pants on the Q have a rise that is way too long. You shouldn't make the rise incredibly long since you lengthened the legs... Most tall women are "all leg" not "all torso"... I don't want to have to wear the waistline up under my b**bs. LOL!

Super Contributor
Posts: 250
Registered: ‎07-14-2010

Ditto on my end as well! There have been quite a few pants that I've been interested in lately that only have 29"" and 30"" inseams. Yikes! I need mine to start at 32"" minimum. Then I'd be placing orders instead of just browsing. And I couldn't agree more with the comments about the rise being way too high......

Valued Contributor
Posts: 699
Registered: ‎02-16-2011

I totally agree.

Their 'average' pants are often 30 or 31 inches. No way. and I am not that tall, I am 5'8" but I have a short waist and very long legs.

Even some of the talls they do have are 32-33 inches. Anywhere else THAT would be average. I ordered some D&C talls once, and the waist, literally with no exaggeration, came up to my bra band. Every other retailer manages to produce clothing in 3 different lengths and QVC has at least as many customers, I don't know why they can't get it together with their pants. I have purchased and enjoyed many tops but I have never once bought a pair of pants from QVC that fit. I have given up.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 21,095
Registered: ‎07-26-2014
On 8/12/2014 gardensla said:

Add me to the call for more pants in a TALL option; 34 inches would be ideal.

DITTO!

"Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."


220-AuCC-US-CRM-Header-Update.gif