Q Talk

[just wonder]

Seems like everytime I open an email from QVC, go to the website, etc. a picture of a certain non-host (at least according to the Meet the Hosts page), pops up, instead of 

seeing the pictures of the beloved hosts we have loved for YEARS-perhaps I am missing something here, but seems like QVC could prominately picture more popular hosts who have been with QVC for the better part of these 40 years we are supposed to be honoring/celebrating.    Perhaps these past 40 years don't matter as much as promoting the direction that is sadly sinking the once-super successful QVC.

[They CallMe MRWILKES]

Move or perish.

Focusing on 1986 hosts is likely part of the problem.  Time to evolve or face entire extinction. 

This specific change may not help, but neither will adherence to those faces from 40 years ago. 

My personal opinion and analysis. 

[Tori3569]

The past 40 years don't matter a single iota.  There are plenty of you tube videos you can go watch to reminisce 

[Estellee]

Is the OP referring to Mally or former hosts?

[Kachina624]

@Estellee.  Like you, I have no idea to whom she's referring. I don't sit and study the pictures on QVC junk mail.

[ellaphant]

" beloved hosts"? Sorry, I have zero attachment to any Q hosts. Qs main problem is they were stuck in the past and never moved forward with the digital movement. Now they're

trying to play catch up too late. They will never attract a younger demo, they're losing their

aging demo. 

[San Antonio Gal]

---

@Estellee wrote:

Is the OP referring to Mally or former hosts?

---

@Estellee  -  I was wondering the same thing.  I wonder why the OP won't tell us who she's talking about?

[Tori3569]

---

@San Antonio Gal wrote:

---

@Estellee wrote:

Is the OP referring to Mally or former hosts?

---

@Estellee  -  I was wondering the same thing.  I wonder why the OP won't tell us who she's talking about?

---

Look at the title in post #2

[just wonder]

Of course talking about Mally!  Who else is the non-host who has jumped ahead of other new actual hosts who are pictured on the Meet the Host Page to have her own primetime show for some reason without having to do the overnight shifts, then be relegated to Q2 etc.?  And get her picture plastered all over?  Lastly I wish those who have commented about basically moving on from former hosts to these new brand of hosts would please explain why they should not be recognized more in this 40 years of QVC success etc.?  Yes, QVC USED TO BE SUCCESSFUL, buy anyone who is aware of QVC's current dismal state of affairs needs to explain how these new faces are working whereas those who brought QVC to the dance should be pushed over??  If QVC wants to be a big promo for the next 40, that's where this person belongs, and we'll see if it works, hope it does for QVC''s sake, but not all over the place praising the original 40 years when except for the last couple, three or so, it was in good standing, not filing for bankruptcy, and not bleeding customers etc.

[San Antonio Gal]

---

@Tori3569 wrote:

---

@San Antonio Gal wrote:

---

@Estellee wrote:

Is the OP referring to Mally or former hosts?

---

@Estellee  -  I was wondering the same thing.  I wonder why the OP won't tell us who she's talking about?

---

Look at the title in post #2

---

Thank you @Tori3569 .