Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 77,950
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

 


@societylady wrote:

 Just my opinion! Jane and Courtney are not compatible at all. Their shows are a hot mess. Anyone else agree?


@societylady    They seem to be perfectly compatible.  Courtney nods and models while Jane babbles.  Most hosts wouldn't put up with that but apparently Courtney is content with the role.  It's a career killer for her whether she realizes it or not. 

 

They're good friends outside of QVC and even vacation together. 

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,549
Registered: ‎02-10-2013

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

[ Edited ]

I laughed when I saw them slated for a garden show...together (again, naturally)! Not only does this appear as some weird co-dependency but there is no way CK gardens with her nails like that, hair constantly being fixed and makeup perfect. She does not strike me as a person that gets into the mud, JT would though. It also appears to me that no matter what "they" say, some people are not good with working with others (not team players.)

 

JT manages to talk over SK in their new Friday beauty show. That is some feat! And those two are more awkward together than JT and CK.  They are supposedly buddies too. 

Super Contributor
Posts: 405
Registered: ‎11-17-2012

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

I agree. I haven't "watched" QVC since before Thanksgiving. The dual hosts was one of a number issues that stopped me from watching on-air presentations.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,482
Registered: ‎05-08-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…


@Desertdi wrote:

They could use a digitalized "person" using flash cards as host, and use mannequins as "models".   

 

 


Oh my gosh......so funny!  Hopefully the digitalized "person" doesn't have kids to brag about or recently been on a vacation to where everyone is "happy".  They also wouldn't own multitudes of each item!

 

Win! Win!....probably more product info, too.

Fear not Brothers and Sisters! I have read THE BOOK..........we win!!!
Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,482
Registered: ‎05-08-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…


@Kachina624 wrote:

 


@societylady wrote:

 Just my opinion! Jane and Courtney are not compatible at all. Their shows are a hot mess. Anyone else agree?


@societylady    They seem to be perfectly compatible.  Courtney nods and models while Jane babbles.  Most hosts wouldn't put up with that but apparently Courtney is content with the role.  It's a career killer for her whether she realizes it or not. 

 

They're good friends outside of QVC and even vacation together. 


@Kachina624  Really?  To the place where everyone is "happy"?  

Fear not Brothers and Sisters! I have read THE BOOK..........we win!!!
Honored Contributor
Posts: 77,950
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

@tends2dogs    I don't know where they went.  Don't listen to them long enough to find out, but that's a logical guess. 

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,338
Registered: ‎03-13-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

I think they took a page from all the "news" show formats...

 

Five people on every set...so when they make a simple statement , such as "the sky is blue"... we can have a "Panel of Experts" explain what that means, cause we're too bovinely stupid to figure it out for ourselves!!!!

 

Let's look in: 

 

"The sky is blue"

 

Host 1) "well it's really an azure color., with hints of pink..."

 

Host 2) "it's blue NOW, but wait til later when the storm moves in"

 

Host 3) "Tomorrow the sky may NOT be blue....we need to investigate WHY NOT???"

 

Host 4) "The reason it's blue is ________________(fill in whomever you want to blame today...it's ALWAYS someone else's fault).

 

 

Host 5) " If this blue sky doesn't change soon, _________will happen ....You just watch!!!"

(Fill in your own outrageous crisis)

 

That's why I like Bloomberg finance channel for my "news"...they run a TINY article, in text ,on the right of the screen, and, by using MY OWN BRAIN, I found I CAN figure out what one sentence saying "the sky is blue" means!!..

 

.I don't need a panel of experts,scantily clad bimboes. or hairsprayed men to explain it to me!!!

 

Try it and see!!!

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,082
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

I NEVER watch shows hosted by multiple hosts, and esp never watch J and C - what's with them anyhow?

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,358
Registered: ‎06-06-2012

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…


@Kachina624 wrote:

 


@societylady wrote:

 Just my opinion! Jane and Courtney are not compatible at all. Their shows are a hot mess. Anyone else agree?


@societylady    They seem to be perfectly compatible.  Courtney nods and models while Jane babbles.  Most hosts wouldn't put up with that but apparently Courtney is content with the role.  It's a career killer for her whether she realizes it or not. 

 

They're good friends outside of QVC and even vacation together. 

 

I can't count how many times JT mentioned last night that her, Court & her girls just came back from a quick weekend trip to Disney (of course she didn't say the actual name). Every presentation of a shoe she mentioned their weekend getaway and how many steps they took at the park.


 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,331
Registered: ‎01-09-2011

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

Why?

Because they want to ensure NOBODY will get a word in edgewise to explain what is being sold.

"Cats are poetry in motion. Dogs are gibberish in neutral." -Garfield