Reply
Highlighted
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,592
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

 If things are so tight financially that they have to lay off Carolyn and all those other employees, why are they still having shows with two hosts?  I could see occasionally on a special show but not the constant Courney and Jane shows.  Shoe shows, fashion shows.  Do they think the viewers are stupid?  I know this has probably been discussed but I cannot stop

bringing it up.  Courtney is a very capable host by herself.  Jane - well someone in management likes her style.  Not me.  I skip all her shows. But if Jane is capable enough to keep on board, then she should be alone in her shows.  

Honored Contributor
Posts: 9,432
Registered: ‎06-06-2019

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

Mgmt must have their reasons.  None of us would have answers for you.  I doubt it has anything to do with viewers stupidity.  They do not answer to us.  

Contributor
Posts: 55
Registered: ‎03-04-2023

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

Kourtney should go- not a good host at all.

Did anybody see how short Julia's dress was?

Just stop the over selling, too obvious.

 

Contributor
Posts: 40
Registered: ‎03-06-2023

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

I was flipping channels and saw Courtney and Jane on with a product presenter.

I really think Jane can handle these shows on her own. 

She is a pro, has her following, and can sell tons of product. 

With much respect, Courtney adds no value to the conversation when presenting a product other than repeating colors every 5 seconds. 

She is a pretty woman, perhaps she can be a model on the shows?

 

 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,714
Registered: ‎12-14-2018

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

Totally agree with everything you said. It doesn't make sense and frankly the two of them together are a nuisance.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,036
Registered: ‎09-04-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

It's too bad they don't listen to the customers.

We only want ONE host at a time!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,182
Registered: ‎12-22-2013

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

I wonder this too.  No other channel does this.  I have not watched a presentation on Q in a long time.  When I do pass it while looking for something to watch I feel for me it is too much going on to actually enjoy a presentation.  Especially when they have a spokesperson for the product on there too.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 73,029
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

@misschristy    QVC management sees the sales figures and can best judge what formula generates the most activity.  The responsibility to stockholders is on them so don't spend your time worrying about it. 

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,628
Registered: ‎08-28-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…


@misschristy wrote:

 If things are so tight financially that they have to lay off Carolyn and all those other employees, why are they still having shows with two hosts?  I could see occasionally on a special show but not the constant Courney and Jane shows.  Shoe shows, fashion shows.  Do they think the viewers are stupid?  I know this has probably been discussed but I cannot stop

bringing it up.  Courtney is a very capable host by herself.  Jane - well someone in management likes her style.  Not me.  I skip all her shows. But if Jane is capable enough to keep on board, then she should be alone in her shows.  


Hosts are on contract, they are not paid by the hour.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 20,455
Registered: ‎03-13-2010

Re: Why? Still having multiple hosts on shows…

They could use a digitalized "person" using flash cards as host, and use mannequins as "models".   

 

 

♥Surface of the Sun♥