Reply
Regular Contributor
Posts: 206
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

SATURDAY MORNING SHOW WAS DELIGHTFUL!

It was such a nice show without Kirsten and Alberti or whoever usually fills in for Kirsten. No screeching, jumping around, stupidity or lectures about eating and nutrition.

 

It was calm and quiet and professional. Rachel and Mary should host every week. 

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,724
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: SATURDAY MORNING SHOW WAS DELIGHTFUL!

Sorry, but trading frenetic, egotistical, clownishness for auctioneering with fake sign language just equates the nails on the chalkboard effect.   unwatchable!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 71,881
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: SATURDAY MORNING SHOW WAS DELIGHTFUL!

I found it very watchable and a nice change of pace.  I usually don't watch QVC Saturday mornings.

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,337
Registered: ‎04-19-2016

Re: SATURDAY MORNING SHOW WAS DELIGHTFUL!

I watch zero Kirsten.

Frequent Contributor
Posts: 96
Registered: ‎04-03-2019

Re: SATURDAY MORNING SHOW WAS DELIGHTFUL!

Sick of the "health couch" telling us what to eat, exercise and how much sleep we need!!

 

Super Contributor
Posts: 325
Registered: ‎08-13-2020

Re: SATURDAY MORNING SHOW WAS DELIGHTFUL!

I happened to catch part of SMQ, and I thought Mary and Rachel were good together. During the bit that I saw, they did not spend their time trying to outdo each other, like the pairing of Alberti/Rachel or Alberti/Kirsten. I stopped tuning in to SMQ after David left. Some hosts just don't click.
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,632
Registered: ‎12-14-2018

Re: SATURDAY MORNING SHOW WAS DELIGHTFUL!

Wish I'd known the two "regulars" weren't there ~ I might have watched.

Highlighted
Honored Contributor
Posts: 15,454
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: SATURDAY MORNING SHOW WAS DELIGHTFUL!

I did catch a bit of that show--usually I never watch but-----but did turned the channel--not a fan of those two much.