Qvc is pricing themselves out of buisness - Page 3

Desertdi · ‎03-13-2010

@Pearlee wrote:
@Desertdi. The V in QVC is supposed to stand for Value so in a way it is advertising itself as having good prices.

@Pearlee I take "value" to mean that you get what you pay for, but not necessarily a "bargain".......... di

♥Surface of the Sun♥

LindaSal · ‎05-15-2014

@Nicknack ITA, even though they are owned by the same parent company, HSN has handled things much better all around, even with this virus. I have been ordering more from that channel than QVC for quite awhile now.

qbetzforreal · ‎08-28-2010

QVC's marketing strategy in terms of clothing is compare itself to high end stores and promote the clothing as designer clothing to justify pricing.

Pecky · ‎03-10-2010

@Anonymous032819 wrote:
So the Q sells stuff that was made in China.

So does Amazon, yet I don't hear anyone belly-aching about that.

No, it's only the "big bad evil" QVC who's doing it.

As for their prices, are people also just as upset that Mercedes isn't selling for cheaper?

@Anonymous032819 Exactly! People say they are shopping at Macy's, Amazon and other places and they all made in China too, Nobody says anything about that.

roeroe1005 · ‎03-13-2010

Q's clothing prices have climbed - especially "house" brands D&C and Susan Graver.

Many of their clothing $$$ is comparable to stores like J.Jill, Chico's, etc. The only difference is that J.Jill has 30%, 40% sales at least once a month. More so these past 3 months. And they mark down their clothing pretty quickly.

I've been following a pair of Ripka earrings that must be about 3 years old. One review in all this time. And the earrings have increased in price. If you are still have that many pieces after 3 years, come on, mark those items down.

At one time Q was IT because stores were mostly B&M. But everyone has caught up with online shopping and a many have surpassed.

World Traveler · ‎02-02-2015

@Luvsmyfam No, they're not.

Lali1 · ‎08-21-2014

@Blackeyedsusan wrote:
Who can afford to spend that on a pair of jeans. Especially in today's environment. Not me!

I'll admit I am a frugal girl who doesn't have to be. A lot of the Q's product lines are just too pricey. Susan Graver I won't even watch because you can't buy anything for less then $70 after shipping. That's the issue after they charge $40 or more you end paying at least $50 with shipping. And shipping right now is taking forever.

KKJ · ‎03-11-2010

@Lali1 wrote:
@Blackeyedsusan wrote:
Who can afford to spend that on a pair of jeans. Especially in today's environment. Not me!

I'll admit I am a frugal girl who doesn't have to be. A lot of the Q's product lines are just too pricey. Susan Graver I won't even watch because you can't buy anything for less then $70 after shipping. That's the issue after they charge $40 or more you end paying at least $50 with shipping. And shipping right now is taking forever.

I feel that way about LOGO, so expensive!

Lali1 · ‎08-21-2014

@KKJ wrote:
@Lali1 wrote:
@Blackeyedsusan wrote:
Who can afford to spend that on a pair of jeans. Especially in today's environment. Not me!

I'll admit I am a frugal girl who doesn't have to be. A lot of the Q's product lines are just too pricey. Susan Graver I won't even watch because you can't buy anything for less then $70 after shipping. That's the issue after they charge $40 or more you end paying at least $50 with shipping. And shipping right now is taking forever.
I feel that way about LOGO, so expensive!

Don't get me started 🤐

Cats3000 · ‎10-07-2013

If they are, they'll find out soon enough and either change their pricing or fold. If the latter happens, someone else will fill the void. Not to worry.