Q DID WHAT? PREVIEW 1/9-10--SPOILED DAY AND SHEEP ... - Page 3

katiescarlett · ‎03-24-2010

@millieshops wrote:
Pretty funny. Your complaint is pretty much the same one you always make and with the same pictures. So why not you do something new? You don't even have to get 50,000 people to spend their money and you do the same thing over and over. Boring - and probably now convincing only to those who already believe what you do and maybe a cat lover here and there.

You end up preaching to the choir - I'm out of here.

Ah, the cheerleaders are chiming in! You know, those of us who read SPURT's weekly post enjoy the tongue-in-cheek poking fun at the repetitious weekend offerings of QVC, with the bonus of great pictures!

Your snarky remarks are what are boring, no matter what thread you post on with your buddy (who, as you say, believes what you do), and we all know who that is.

So, my suggestion is that if you don't like this weekly thread, then don't read it! The rest of us will continue to enjoy it, the comments, the pictures, and adding our own thoughts!

And in response to your comment "I'm out of here" .....good riddance!

Saving one dog won’t change the world, but it will surely change the world for that one dog
Richard C. Call

katiescarlett · ‎03-24-2010

@millieshops wrote:
@GinaV24Right, I don't have to read it and I don't get past one cat, but since you're being so helpful to explain that, let me explain to you, I'm also entiitled to my opinion. It's every bit as valid as yours. Not better, not worse, equal.

Opinions are only as good as the facts on which they are based - we just use a different set of facts as we reach different opinions. Probably always will.

Yes, you are entitled to your opinion, just as SPURT is entitled to write her weekly post without changing it as you suggested earlier. Just as we are entitled to have fun with it.

Saving one dog won’t change the world, but it will surely change the world for that one dog
Richard C. Call

jackthebear · ‎03-11-2010

@stevieb wrote:
@stevieb wrote:
..
Oh my gosh... I haven't watched the Q in so long and now I'm reminded why... After being pretty much a non-viewer for most of the last year, I tried to endure both PM Style and a two hour Halston show this week... Wow, it's like watching as a newbie all over again. Given that perspective, I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone tuning in now for the first time would stay tuned in or would ever come back... Holy cow, the shows are so frantic and yet move so slowly they're akin to watching a soap opera... so much drama that never goes anywhere... Without fail, they're spending 20 or more minutes on virtually every item... HELLO. IT'S BORING... And yes, it's true, they need to reign in their hosts and their vendors, who are just too annoying too much of the time.

@stevieb excellent description of what is going on now, especially the Monday night Fashion programming, I used to watch it, but now I don't tune in at all. It is a mess. PMStyle needed a rework but not this

Spurt · ‎03-20-2010

@stevieb wrote:

Well now I think this might be a first... We all know there are those... who seek out every Q-critical thread and arrive in time to dispute the criticisms and sing their praises. The reasons aren't particularly clear... Employees? We're told no... Stockholders? Who knows... Regardless... going onto a thread where one knows what one is going to find and then getting mad when they find it, well, that pretty much ices it, even if the articulation isn't precisely clear. Out of here, you say? Well, that works, and please, don't let the screen door hit ya...

@stevieb Well said....I just don't understand why people waste so much of their valuable time on a thread that contains content that they don't like---Gee, since they love to give us "valuable" advice, I'd like to recipocate---my option for them would be to just move along and go write a nice gushy note on the host's FB page or something .....BTW do the QVC DEFENDERS have their own t-shirts....