Q Talk

[Shanus]

Last night was not a good lineup of shows. We’ve all asked for “less expensive” offerings.

There were expensive wigs, Stephen Dwek (over the top priced jewelry) and Vince’s clothing....way too high prices for a top or top. 

Why put these shows all in a row so no one can purchase?

[millieshops]

I watched a bit of the jewelry -  no idea how many of anything they brought in, but the pieces I saw were beautiful and seemed to be selling. 

I didn't mind the prices, but I'm irrelevant. I am sticking to my resolve to wear the jewelry I have already and the show reminded me to look for the Dwecks rings I have from a few years ago -  haven't worn them for ages.  Shame on me!

Didn't watc any of the Vince show, so I can't comment on that, but I did watch the TSV for a few minutes.  I thought the TSV top looked much better on almost everyone than it did in the pictures for the pre-sale.  Great colors.  I wasn't surprised to hear Amy broadcast the sales of it.

[Skididdy]

@Shanus, very well stated. 

Really unsure where the Q is going these days.

The expensive brands, the shoes are just so over the top.

This again will fall on deaf ears in my opinion. 

But I am sure that there are many who purchase the 545.00 necklaces, the 180.00 shoes, and on and on.  I find myself watching less and less.  SO MUCH FOR THE V IN QVC...NOT MUCH VALUE THESE DAYS.

[deeva]

I don’t mind that QVC has products to appeal to a variety of incomes.

What I may find expensive, others might not. 

[Q4u]

I love looking at the jewelry but this particular designer makes items that look like every other Sterling designer that's out there ever since Sterling became Big....  I have enough Ripka pieces, disappointed in the Hawkins line and my favorite that I've not tired of at all and made supremely well.... Jai.  So I'll watch and enjoy but not invest.....  

[dex]

I noticed there is more easy pay to help us purchase the stuff we can’t afford.

[Shanus]

---

@Skididdywrote:

@Shanus, very well stated. 

Really unsure where the Q is going these days.

The expensive brands, the shoes are just so over the top.

This again will fall on deaf ears in my opinion. 

But I am sure that there are many who purchase the 545.00 necklaces, the 180.00 shoes, and on and on.  I find myself watching less and less.  SO MUCH FOR THE V IN QVC...NOT MUCH VALUE THESE DAYS.

---

@Skididdy  Someone did research (don’t know which forum) that Q’s targeting women 35-70 w/ income $50,000 to $250,000. Who are they kidding? That includes most of us, but we “ain’t” buying!

[Shanus]

---

@deevawrote:

I don’t mind that QVC has products to appeal to a variety of incomes.

What I may find expensive, others might not. 

---

@deeva Any way you look at it, a lot of the offerings are expensive. Some purchasers can afford it...different story. 

[Shanus]

---

@dexwrote:

I noticed there is more easy pay to help us purchase the stuff we can’t afford.

---

@dex  ....and they keep pushing the Q Card to receive extra easy pays. 

[Shanus]

Watching Lisa Rinna now while folding laundry....$73.50 for 1 flowing top?!?!?  Easy pay or not, it’s still $73.50! 

.....and what’s with the front of her tops shorter while the backs hang down to the knees. They look like knit tops that stretched out from tucking them underneath your behind to sit. When that happens to my knits, they get donated.

........”but Harry will never have to work again”.