Reply
Regular Contributor
Posts: 245
Registered: ‎04-30-2010

I am guilty of making an assumption but one day the powers at QVc decided to bring known designers onto the Q.  Probably the idea was that most of their customers did not shop on Rodeo Drive and would be excited to buy designer clothing in their price range.  I can agree with that idea.  The designer who does this best is Bob Mackie.  Each garment is carefully designed and made to make the wearer look her best. Each one is special is some way.   Can't say that about every designer though.  I won't point anyone out but  some  designers make clothing that only looks good on a size 0.  Sometimes I just flinch when I see the hosts wearing a TSV that looks dreadful on them.  

 

When it comes to spending money I am frugal. I get really irritated when a " designer" presents a plain unadorned tee shirt and acts like it is wonderful beyond compare.  Really?  The Q should insist that if they want to sell their stuff it should be special.  In other words design something!!  Sorry but not spending $40 for a shirt when I can get 5  that look just like it for the same price elsewhere. .  I  have seen really cute and interesting things on other channels for better prices.  Apparently the Q is making tons of money but they could do alot better with some imagination.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 18,504
Registered: ‎05-23-2010

Not a "designer" person with very few exceptions. Most of QVC's "designer" clothing is just a faux-lebrity's name on some nameless manufacturer's goods, anyway - they had maybe 10-20% feedback into design at most. 

 

ITA about the plain t-shirts, any shirts/tops, and basic capris, shorts, jeans, etc. I can buy those anywhere, either locally or online at other retailers for half the price. Why would I buy them here? Quality's no better, there is no "design", and if they don't fit you could have bought one somewhere else for what the back-and-forth postage costs. It's bizarre.

 

My mother was the type to turn her clothing back over a chair so everyone could see the labels. QVC is assuming, I guess, that most of their customers are the same. But - a label announcing Lisa Rinna, Susan Graver, etc. - laughable as far as impressing anyone.

Life without Mexican food is no life at all
Contributor
Posts: 61
Registered: ‎12-20-2013

I understanding  what your saying. Before I get hate vibes for mentioning a certain designer please know that in general I like this man and his line of clothing. However the other day he made a statement to the fact that he never pays attention to what clothes cost he loves clothes, but then he has to remember that not everyone is in his position

to buy when ever and what ever he likes. He does has some of the 40 dollar t-shirts that everyone must have and in multiply colors. Thank you Issac for at least  once in a while remembering not everyone is in your economic class and I would hope that you remember that it is us "little" people  that put you in the position not have to look at what things cost. Sadly I still do and probably will always.

Valued Contributor
Posts: 826
Registered: ‎01-21-2011

Here's my 2 cents worth of opinions..The word "designer" is given to almost any person who can pick up a pencil and not just on QVC.  Most of these "designers" are merely celebrities who probably have never picked up a needle and thread in their lives.  IMO, Oscar de la Renta, Bob Mackie, Nolan Miller, Halston, Ralph Lauren, Carolina Herrera and that group were truly designers.  I realize their designs cost big bucks and I could never afford the major designers but I also have no need for that kind of clothing.  However, I am also not going to spend $40 for a t-shirt because it says IM, SG, LR, Giuliana Rancic, Melissa McCarthy, LG-who has some of the worst "designs" I've ever seen and so on.  Since when is every cardigan a  big piece of polyester with no structure, no buttons, no shape?  It is almost impossible to buy slacks that have a button and fly and don't show the hair follicles on your legs.  I guess I expect too much from the Q's and HSN "designers".  I would love to see more of Louis Dell'Olio and a whole lot less of  some of these other house "designers".  

Occasional Contributor
Posts: 11
Registered: ‎02-11-2012

To Bootsanne:  I could not agree with you more!  These "designers" are laughable until you see the prices they are asking for some of these items.  I'm so disillusioned with QVC and their "designer" brands.  And quite honestly I cannot even stand to watch the program when they're on with the exception of Isaac and Louis Del'olio.  I feel the same way about the newer hosts.  If they only listened to themselves.  I may be forced to go back shopping in a real store with real brand names.  

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,022
Registered: ‎11-20-2010

I do not think the prices at QVC are out of line.  Yes, at the B&M stores we can use coupons and get better prices and bonus buys, etc.   At QVC we are not paying for "designer" names, we are paying for the cost of a good grade of fabric and details at least in the brands I buy. That is what is important to me and what I find in Graver abd Issac for fabric and extra detail  Everything I have purchased from these brands has been of good quallity.  Also like Denim & Co.  I buy limlited amount of Mackie, Joan Rivers, Kim Gravel and have found the same with these brands.  I get many catalogs and the prices are more than at QVC for similar grades of clothing.   I would rather pay a few dollars more for SG and IM.  All I have to do is go to the Mall or Kohls and feel the material and back to QVC I go.  In fact if I don't have a coupon and the item is not on sale, brands I would buy in B&M are more than at QVC.

 

I am happy with QVC for the most part.  My issue would be with inconsistent sizing, but I do not think that is QVC's fault.  I find it in all brands of clothes everywhere.  It is a manufacturing issue not the seller's fault.  Doesn't matter where you purchase, sizing is no longer consistent - probably because no longer made in the USA.  I tried on two pairs of pants same brand, same style, different colors at the Mall last trip and they both fit different.  Same Mall, different store, one top fit in a M and the other in a L - same brand.  Too bad but that is a fact of life now.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,061
Registered: ‎06-24-2011

I was taught that price was what the consumer was willing to pay based on perceived value. I was also taught: first create a need, next create perceived value, find a niche, choose a price point, and market.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,271
Registered: ‎04-20-2013

@KathyM23 wrote:

I do not think the prices at QVC are out of line.  Yes, at the B&M stores we can use coupons and get better prices and bonus buys, etc.   At QVC we are not paying for "designer" names, we are paying for the cost of a good grade of fabric and details at least in the brands I buy. That is what is important to me and what I find in Graver abd Issac for fabric and extra detail  Everything I have purchased from these brands has been of good quallity.  Also like Denim & Co.  I buy limlited amount of Mackie, Joan Rivers, Kim Gravel and have found the same with these brands.  I get many catalogs and the prices are more than at QVC for similar grades of clothing.   I would rather pay a few dollars more for SG and IM.  All I have to do is go to the Mall or Kohls and feel the material and back to QVC I go.  In fact if I don't have a coupon and the item is not on sale, brands I would buy in B&M are more than at QVC.

 

I am happy with QVC for the most part.  My issue would be with inconsistent sizing, but I do not think that is QVC's fault.  I find it in all brands of clothes everywhere.  It is a manufacturing issue not the seller's fault.  Doesn't matter where you purchase, sizing is no longer consistent - probably because no longer made in the USA.  I tried on two pairs of pants same brand, same style, different colors at the Mall last trip and they both fit different.  Same Mall, different store, one top fit in a M and the other in a L - same brand.  Too bad but that is a fact of life now.


@KathyM23- I agree.  The designers on QVC are producing clothing of good quality for those of us who can not afford, want or need their couture lines.  I love IM; his clothing is a very good quality and his tee shirts are better than many in B&M stores.  I have purchased equal quality at Nordstrom and have paid a much higher price unless on sale.  I don't like flimsy tees with no body or see through apparel.  IMs tees just feel nice and look finished.  I believe you get what you pay for and I don't find QVC prices out of line.  The cost of living is just higher.  I do get good deals from JJill but even their t shirts are not as nice as Isaacs.  I'm pretty happy with QVC.  My lifestyle is casual as I am retired but I still like to look nice.  The best thing about QVC is the variety of sizes, colors and styles.  Right now, I've had positive experiences with C Wonder

Valued Contributor
Posts: 826
Registered: ‎01-21-2011

Please don't get me wrong that I'm a designer snob.  I buy a lot from QVC, mostly IM because that is the brand I've had the most luck with size wise.  My last 2 purchases, a top by Belle and another top from Denim & Co., were a waste of $18.50 in postage.  I had sized up on both tops because of the supposed 5% spandex.  They both fit like sausage casing.  These were both a basic t-shirt style, both over $30 each.  I recently purchased over $400 worth of clothes from Ulla Popken, a plus-size catalogue.  100% cotton tank tops, size 18-20 for $7.49, matching cardigans $14.00.  3 large bags of clothing, flat rate $8.95 shipping and 40% off.  I made a haul for summer and fall.  None had "designer" labels.  I guess what I'm trying to say is that what the shopping channels are passing off as "designer" are just merely house brands at inflated prices.

Super Contributor
Posts: 267
Registered: ‎10-31-2015

Suffice it to say there are designers and there are DESIGNERS. We know the difference. 

TOP