Reply
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,097
Registered: ‎09-05-2014

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.

If I'm not allowed to use gender pronouns for people any longer, I'll save mine up and apply them to things.  I like the idea.   

 

My alarm clock, she woke me up this morning.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,001
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.

Interesting comments above ......... hearing clothing items, etc., referred to as "she" does not offend me.  But it does make the person saying it seem ignorant.  

* A woman is like a tea bag. You can't tell how strong she is until you put her in hot water. *
- Eleanor Roosevelt
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,798
Registered: ‎06-07-2010

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.


@Venezia wrote:

@this is my nic- I couldn't agree with you more!  Yes, it's been discussed before, but it is still just as ridiculous.

 

It also drives me nuts, when they keep saying you "wear" a handbag.  No, you don't; it's not a piece of clothing.  You "carry" a handbag.

 

I didn't realize they'd started referring to pieces of clothing as "she" or "her".  I wonder why they want to dumb down everything?  Cute, it isn't.  Woman Frustrated


@Venezia  I'm so glad you mentioned about "wearing" a handbag.  That is the dumbest expression IMO.  You don't wear it, you carry it!

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,271
Registered: ‎09-07-2014

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.

I think I'll wear my new handbag as she is lovely. Let me take you on a tour of her.   😜😁👜

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,602
Registered: ‎03-21-2017

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.

Doesn’t bother me at all.  It’s not a big deal. I think it sounds perfectly natural, and I don’t believe there is any grammatical rule about this.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,386
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.

Doesn't bother me at all.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,349
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.

What cracks me up is when peope refer to "ALEXA" as a she when it is an it!! It's all silly!!

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,020
Registered: ‎05-06-2016

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.


@Krimpette wrote:

Doesn't bother me at all.


Me neither. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 21,733
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.


@Mona_L wrote:

@Retired08 wrote:

@blueLagoon wrote:

Spanish:

 

la blusa = blouse  (la is feminine ... her)

As I remember this, the la is used to indicate that it is a blouse for a woman, not a shirt for a man.  Not to make the blouse a "she". 

 

 

 

 

 

@Retired08 No, that's not correct.  For instance .. if talking about lady's perfume ... in Spanish it is: 

 

el perfume

La vendedora le traerá el perfume que quiere.

(Therefore, the word 'perfume' is masculine.)


@Mona_L, as several posters have already said, you are conflating languages that have a feminine and masculine delineation for nouns with the the actual attribution of gender to a noun in English.


~Who in the world am I? Ah, that's the great puzzle~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
Honored Contributor
Posts: 34,888
Registered: ‎05-17-2010

Re: Clothing and handbags do not have a gender.


@Mothertrucker wrote:

Very  true, in the English language, nouns have no gender, but in most others, including ALL Romance languages, they do..

 

In fact, in French, a purse is male... So is a hat, but a baselball cap is female...

 

Does this really actually bother people?


 

 

@Mothertrucker  I guess only if we’re speaking in English. Lol