Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,611
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER


@Patriot3 wrote:

She's really milking this for all it's worth............


@Patriot3 

Looksl like I did!

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,415
Registered: ‎12-13-2010

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER


@Ladyrain wrote:

A lot was left out of that article, or at least sugar coated.  
      Antonella didn't "lose" the house to repossesion by the bank.   They sold it, at a profit.  Granted, without jobs they could no longer afford the monthly mortgage payments, but the bank didn't yank it out from under them.   It is all in the real estate transfer records.  
        And COBRA insurance was always an option.   Whether she took advantage of that i don't know.  Costly, yes - but an available option, especially with a cancer diagnosis.  
        Also, she had a GoFundMr account, which stilll exists to this day.  I am not at all saying there weren't challenges in her life.  I am just sayig that she is less than forthcoming on some of the details.   Hopefully all the health challenges are reseolved and done and over with and she, her husband and son can continue to live out their lives peacefully and safe and sound on the boat.


@Ladyrain are you saying you found and read her real estate details??? If so, that's pathetic.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,515
Registered: ‎05-09-2010

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER

She did sell her house. I recall her saying on a post on facebook that the first deal fell through. I saw the real estate listing - beautiful home. There would not be a listing if it weren’t for sale. To me, the term “lost it,” means the bank took it back, not that they sold it. So she should have said that they had to sell, not that they lost if. But the truth is less dramatic.
Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else. Margaret Mead
Contributor
Posts: 51
Registered: ‎11-14-2022

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER

That's not a real Us Weekly cover -- they'd never put a washed up former QVC host as a cover story. It's probably some AI mockup that Kerstin made to boost her podcast.
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,415
Registered: ‎12-13-2010

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER


@GGS wrote:
That's not a real Us Weekly cover -- they'd never put a washed up former QVC host as a cover story. It's probably some AI mockup that Kerstin made to boost her podcast.

Well aren't you so nice??

 Its not a cover. Its a page from the magazine and on line edition.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 15,008
Registered: ‎11-03-2018

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER

Why would she say they lost their home to foreclosure?  She sold it to live on the boat, which as I recall was their "dream."  

 

She seems to bend the truth when it's convenient.  

Valued Contributor
Posts: 775
Registered: ‎06-04-2010

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER

[ Edited ]

@Ladyrain wrote:

A lot was left out of that article, or at least sugar coated.  
      Antonella didn't "lose" the house to repossesion by the bank.   They sold it, at a profit.  Granted, without jobs they could no longer afford the monthly mortgage payments, but the bank didn't yank it out from under them.   It is all in the real estate transfer records.  
        And COBRA insurance was always an option.   Whether she took advantage of that i don't know.  Costly, yes - but an available option, especially with a cancer diagnosis.  
        Also, she had a GoFundMr account, which stilll exists to this day.  I am not at all saying there weren't challenges in her life.  I am just sayig that she is less than forthcoming on some of the details.   Hopefully all the health challenges are reseolved and done and over with and she, her husband and son can continue to live out their lives peacefully and safe and sound on the boat.


Yeah. "Lost the house" does have a foreclosure feel to it, doesn't it? I think I would have said, as someone else suggested, that I had to sell because I couldn't afford the mortgage. She does seem almost intentionally to omit important details.  Cancer, job loss and heart attacks are bad enough without needing to make things seem even worse. (ETA-and yes, so is having to sell one's house, but there is a HUGE difference between selling at a profit and foreclosure.) 

 

The US magazine article is a promotional tool that influencers and lesser celebrities can pay for. I bet if you Google it, you can find out how much it cost them (Antonella and Kerstin, or their agents) to publish it. 

Valued Contributor
Posts: 775
Registered: ‎06-04-2010

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER


@ellaphant wrote:

@Ladyrain wrote:

A lot was left out of that article, or at least sugar coated.  
      Antonella didn't "lose" the house to repossesion by the bank.   They sold it, at a profit.  Granted, without jobs they could no longer afford the monthly mortgage payments, but the bank didn't yank it out from under them.   It is all in the real estate transfer records.  
        And COBRA insurance was always an option.   Whether she took advantage of that i don't know.  Costly, yes - but an available option, especially with a cancer diagnosis.  
        Also, she had a GoFundMr account, which stilll exists to this day.  I am not at all saying there weren't challenges in her life.  I am just sayig that she is less than forthcoming on some of the details.   Hopefully all the health challenges are reseolved and done and over with and she, her husband and son can continue to live out their lives peacefully and safe and sound on the boat.


@Ladyrain are you saying you found and read her real estate details??? If so, that's pathetic.


At the time, the details of the sale were posted on multiple public QVC forums. It was very easy to access. So, no, @Ladyrain is most certainly not pathetic. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,967
Registered: ‎11-16-2014

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER


@GGS wrote:
That's not a real Us Weekly cover -- they'd never put a washed up former QVC host as a cover story. It's probably some AI mockup that Kerstin made to boost her podcast.

Yes, I read from ChatGPT that cover doesn't exist. It came up on my Facebook feed. That's why I checked it. A real shame that we no longer necessarily can believe what we see on the internet.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 14,260
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: ARTICLE RE ANTONELLA NESTER

I've never felt that I could believe what I read on the internet.