Reply
New Contributor
Posts: 2
Registered: ‎03-21-2011

March Diamonique design of the month?

Who knows what the March Diamoniue design of the month is?
Super Contributor
Posts: 1,222
Registered: ‎12-28-2012

Re: March Diamonique design of the month?

Highlighted
Regular Contributor
Posts: 151
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: March Diamonique design of the month?

PLEASE make this in 14k yellow gold!!
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,211
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: March Diamonique design of the month?

I love this ring but the stones are too big! A one carat center stone would be enough for me.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,235
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: March Diamonique design of the month?

Yes, to big for me as well....would not be believable within my circle of friends.

Valued Contributor
Posts: 1,606
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: March Diamonique design of the month?

I agree! Way too big! Smiley Sad. I'm not comfortable in big flashy jewelry.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 39,171
Registered: ‎08-23-2010

Re: March Diamonique design of the month?

A one carat stone is big and flashy? .... Seriously?

Valued Contributor
Posts: 1,606
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: March Diamonique design of the month?

On 3/2/2015 Tinkrbl44 said:

A one carat stone is big and flashy? .... Seriously?

The center stone is 2 carats with almost 1.5 on each side. This ring is almost 5 carats!
New Contributor
Posts: 3
Registered: ‎05-14-2013

Re: March Diamonique design of the month?

On 3/3/2015 Cardamom said:
On 3/2/2015 Tinkrbl44 said:

A one carat stone is big and flashy? .... Seriously? {#emotions_dlg.confused1}

The center stone is 2 carats with almost 1.5 on each side. This ring is almost 5 carats!

I received this ring yesterday, and it is definitely not an over the top looking ring. The center stone is 2 carats, but the side stones are only .75 carats each. The 1.5 carat weight is for the combined weight of the two side stones. Total carat weight for the ring would be near 3.5 carats. I don't really wear lots of bling, but this ring looks quite believable to me.