Jewelry

[lmt]

I don't like it at all. It looks clunky, heavy, overdone and cheap. Not that the price is cheap at $240!!!!

I also think it's very masculine looking.

It's a very unattractive ring, IMO!! 

[Krimpette]

Not to my taste.  I'm more of a Hagit fan.  Simpler designs.

[Jersey Born]

I like these rings.  I find Astrology fascinating, and non-competitive with my religious beliefs.  I like that the symbols of the signs are clearly displayed on the tops of the rings along with the associated animals or objects on the sides of the ring.  I ordered this ring in Aries, Taurus and Leo to represent my parents and their astrological influences on their personalities, and myself and mine.  I think they are fun!

[ALRATIBA]

No interest.  I think horoscopes and astrology are nonsense.

[faeriemoon]

I bought the Bixby cross ring on clearance. 

[Katcat1]

Not interested but I am enjoying Peter Thomas Roth's designs.  He designs are clean, sophisticated reminding me of  Michael Dawkiins.  Peter's gemstones are stunning.

[chessylady]

I thought her bee ring with a citrine stone was attractive.

[faeriemoon]

---

@Katcat1 wrote:

Not interested but I am enjoying Peter Thomas Roth's designs.  He designs are clean, sophisticated reminding me of  Michael Dawkiins.  Peter's gemstones are stunning.

---

I love PTR jewelry too.  I have two of his band rings and I know there is a gemstone (clear quartz) fantasy ring coming my way on Mother's Day.

[lmt]

---

@chessylady wrote:

I thought her bee ring with a citrine stone was attractive.

---

I have that ring. It's even prettier in person. 

[tobes]

Not this one but I have J331985 the vine ring in peridot that i love and wear almost every day.  Purchased it probably more than 10 years ago and looks the same as when I purchased it