whats your opinion of modeling under panties - Page 7

handygal2 · ‎01-19-2015

I'll bet that some of these responses, saying they enjoy bras and panties being modeled, are from dudes.

~~Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the 'm' is silent.~~

GingerPeach · ‎03-12-2010

I would rather see them modeled as "under" panties than to have to see women's underwear worn "over" clothing (as we sometimes see people doing in "fun.")

[was Homegirl] Love to be home . . . thus the screen name. Joined 2003.

Chrystaltree2 · ‎12-08-2014

Why not? There's nothing sinful of obscene about underwesr.

apple1964 · ‎08-07-2013

It does not help me purchase one way or the other. I don't decide how I would look in underware by a model wearing panties.

barrel racer · ‎03-13-2010

I have no problem with it, they cover more than you see at the beach.

CouponQueen · ‎10-21-2010

I didn't read all the responses but I have no issue with it.

I would think that we are in the 21st Century and are progressive enough not to be offended by some undies.

Trinity11 · ‎11-16-2014

It doesn't bother me but I respect those that are uncomfortable with it. Back in the day modeling underwear on television was just not done...

willdob3 · ‎11-01-2010

This subject would have made more sense if it had been asked several decades ago. There is more bare skin seen on prime time TV and on beaches.

QueenDanceALot · ‎04-18-2013

@faeriemoon wrote:
@Sooner wrote:
No problem for me. It's always good to see the items on people unless they are crotchless then the fit doesn't matter so much. . .
Now that's the true meaning of "Breezies."

How funny would that be, for the Breezies lady to have a mannequin demo of crotchless panties?

I'd tune in to see that

hahahahaha

SharkE · ‎08-19-2010

@willdob3 wrote:
This subject would have made more sense if it had been asked several decades ago. There is more bare skin seen on prime time TV and on beaches.

yep, what the poster said in Message 11