Fashion

[sarpy]

How come it hasn't sold out yet?

[Alsee]

It seems to me to be way overpriced, so I guess others agree

[KimberlyD]

On 5/8/2014 Alsee said: It seems to me to be way overpriced, so I guess others agree

Yep!

[Iluv50sog]

because it looks like a waitress uniform

[Sylanne]

JMO, this garment is too short to be a dress for most women (please don't bend over),& too long & bulky to be a tunic top.

It could be used as a swim suit cover-up, but there are so many nicer cover-ups out there at a better price point.

[giova]

On 5/8/2014 Iluv50sog said:

because it looks like a waitress uniform

I agree.

[blueyesny]

I saw the dress at midnite & it didn't even look good on the models!

[faeriemoon]

It doesn't look like a dress to me; it looks like a beach cover-up. It doesn't have much going for it.

[SunnyinSEPA]

It's too short for me (at 5'9") and shapeless--two things I don't look for when buying a dress. IMO you need great legs to wear a dress 6" or more above the knee. That's not me any more.

I was surprised at how Leah styled it with black leggings. Legging season is over, and it didn't look nice anyway. It also looked terrible on Susan. She wore it styled with slip-on sneakers and it just looked frumpy, like a "house dress" or hospital gown.

A casual summer dress was a nice idea, but this one missed the mark. I wouldn't wear it as a swim suit cover up either because I hate pulling things on and off over my head in public.

I have several SG items that I love, so I'm not a "hater." This one was just bad.

[scotslassie]

Because its ugly shapeless and overpriced.