Fashion

[wagirl]

nope--shoes are ridiculous!!!

[ROMARY]

Probably much cuter in person!

[Shanus]

---

@Ladylaughsalot wrote:

I really like it, but as a 65 y/o would never wear it.

---

@Ladylaughsalot  I’m 5 yrs. older, but I’d definitely wear this. It depends on your shape, style and young attitude to pull it off.

[Shanus]

---

@MsChiff wrote:

Not a fan of the jacket or the shoes.  

If one is going to do plaid, spring for a well-made plaid where the plaid matches.  To me, unmatched plaid screams cheap.

The shoes would be too difficult to walk any distance and when you live in a large city like I do, walking is your life.

---

@MsChiff  I’m thinking we’re supposed to just be “inspired” by the outfit...not copy it exactly. I’d seek out a plaid jacket that matched up at the seams, as well. 

[jonbon]

In general, I like the idea of a mix of pieces (that is, distressed denim with pumps or a more structured blazer or whatever), but for some reason her whole look just seems a little sloppy and messy to me.

[ID2]

---

@Ladylaughsalot wrote:

I really like it, but as a 65 y/o would never wear it.

---

Why not??? I'm turning 65 in February and this is the exact style I wear all the time! Its pretty much ageless!

[willdob3]

@lolakimono

I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t wear any of those pieces, together or separately. Not a fan of the look.

[wilma]

I don’t like any of the pieces in this look. I can’t wear mules - my heels would be forever slipping off the end of those shoes. The tee, jeans, and blazer look sloppy to me. 

I am not a fan of distressed jeans, and the sleeves on the jacket are too long. 

My version of that look would be dark wash full length straight leg or trouser jeans with either ankle boots or flats. I would add a structured blazer (with sleeves the correct length) with a knit top underneath. 

[ECBG]

It's ok, but I'm not in love.

[RoughDraft]

Except for the shoes, I dress like this to head for the supermarket.  Not particularly inspiring to me.