Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
12-23-2016 01:47 PM
It was bad in the seventies, and the look has not improved.
12-23-2016 02:16 PM
These are the ones I got on vanity. There not as wide as Susan's but I love them. They are wider than what they look like in the picture.
12-23-2016 02:22 PM
those are really nice @ccassaday!
i also like looks like this........it almost looks like a maxi skirt.
12-23-2016 02:28 PM
I don't even know how you could walk safely in these pants. If it is snowing, I would not even be tempted to wear these pants you could trip and hurt yourself. This is not a style that I would even be interested in. I am petite and this style(if that is what you want to call it) does not seem to be wearable.
12-23-2016 02:28 PM
I did not see what Susan was wearing - but I will say that much/most of the time the very tall models - on all shopping channels - are wearing pants that are way too short for them. Seeing this irritates me way more than it should. lol
Pants that one can step on are bad in the opposite direction but it looks slightly better than too short pants that don't touch the shoe at all and/or that leave a gap between the hem and the shoe.
12-23-2016 02:29 PM
What's nice about vanity jeans is I never pay more than $25. I always order a size bigger then my waiste because they do shrink. But it's nice you can order different inseams and waiste size. Plus they are super good quality. There clothes are always great quality for a really good price. I have ditched kohls for them now.
12-23-2016 02:46 PM
@willdob3 wrote:I did not see what Susan was wearing - but I will say that much/most of the time the very tall models - on all shopping channels - are wearing pants that are way too short for them. Seeing this irritates me way more than it should. lol
Pants that one can step on are bad in the opposite direction but it looks slightly better than too short pants that don't touch the shoe at all and/or that leave a gap between the hem and the shoe.
Problem is that tall lengths are harder to come by. QVC and other retailers always seem to have regular, petite and plus sizes, but rarely or no talls. SG seems to be interested only in those that are 5'4" like she is (lol, she reiminds everyone at least 10 times per show).
I think both extremes - too short and dragging the floor are bad looks.
12-23-2016 03:17 PM
I feel you can still get the right look for wide pants if they just cover the top of your shoe so the front part of your shoes shows! That is how I have always worn them!! Also I can remember in the seventies when that was popular the pants would become frayed at the bottom !!
12-23-2016 04:27 PM
12-23-2016 06:33 PM
@Girlboss wrote:I've seen Susan Graver wearing jeans with really large bell bottoms that cover her shoes. She's worn this look several times on air but I haven't seen the trend take off yet. I can't decide if I like the look or not? I understand that the style elongates your leg which can be flattering but that style also makes you look like you don't have feet. Just wondering what the Q community thinks?
I liked those jeans/pants style. I liked them when they debuted way back in the 70's and I still like them now. The thing is I could never wear them because of my height.
Yesterday
Today!
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788