Fashion

[ALRATIBA]

@santorini 

I agree that they look terribly unattractive!  That picture doesn't do the pants justice.

My look is totally different.  You'd never know that they are the same pants!

=============

---

@santorini wrote:

---

---

Everyone has their own taste but in my opinion, those jeans do not look attractive and they are about 4 inches too short. That's not a look that I will ever wear. 

---

[LTT1]

@jonbon @ALRATIBA @lavendar @santorini @ROMARY 

I do love "paperbag" waist jeans! (and shorts!)

[NYCLatinaMe]

I saw this too!  I had only started to accept skinny or straight jeans in 2019, before that, just bootcut.  2020 of course was the lost year, but wore straight jeans the few times I left the home.  I guess I am glad I still have my boot cuts and can wear them.  I rarely see any of these big jeans out and about, it's mostly, skinnies, straight, or leggings.  No paperbag pants for me.

[Andreatoo]

Nothing being produced these days will ever match the original "mom jeans". They were the unfortunate result of denim with no stretch. A high waist without some stretch is very hard to fit especially when you have hips. Pair that with a narrow ankle and a full leg and you get the dreaded 'mom jean' effect because they don't fit properly through the hips.

I have a couple pairs of jeans that were labeled 'mom jeans'but the only similarity is the high waist 

These carried the infamous label but they are a straight leg and not tapered.

And these too