Fashion

[donovan]

---

@Pearlee wrote:

---

@Donovan wrote:

---

@Snicks1 wrote:

---

@winamac1 wrote:

---

@Snicks1 wrote:
@winamac1, I could not agree more.

---

It's ridiculous how the same c a r a p p gets posted over and over and over again snicks.  Some take such offense to the criticism, but I truly don't care.  I buy what I like, and I don't need validation from my friends or family.

That being said, the bashing of Lori and Logo is getting out of control and it's tiring and boring.  People need to move on.  We all "get" it.  It's not for everyone.  Few really care!  I certainly don't care if one likes my choices.

---

Win, I don't own any LOGO, and I still totally agree with you, and can I just say I don't see any point in posting derogatory remarks or the venom thrown at those who post those remarks in return. It only encourages more of the same. All these threads are so tiresome, from both sides. If you absolutely cannot control yourselves from the postings, at least do it on the LOGO sub-forum.

---

You tried snicks - went right over their heads. 

---

@donovan  Not over my head.  I responded directly to her point.

---

No you didn't.  You totally glossed over the most important part of her post.

[sunshine45]

---

@okaywitheasypay wrote:

I just hope this doesn't escalate into an all out war. I can just envision fashionistas from all sides returning home with tattered $50. clothing items! Ruffles & lace hanging , SG items snagged , underwires popping out , not enough Bare Minerals to cover the battle scars ,  QF ladies not able to quack due to battle !

Can't we all just reside in peace " buy what we love and love what we buy"?

---

@okaywitheasypay

buy what you love and love what you buy......what a concept huh?

would love to see the people who love being so negative actually start a positive post on what they DO love and buy......we would probably be more interested in THAT.

lori and LOGO.....keep on doing what you are doing.

some of the pieces in this line work for me and i am happy with the designs, colors, quality, and selection.

[sunshine45]

---

@febe1 wrote:

---

@winamac1 wrote:

---

@febe1 wrote:

---

@winamac1 wrote:

---

@Snicks1 wrote:
@winamac1, I could not agree more.

---

It's ridiculous how the same c a r a p p gets posted over and over and over again snicks.  Some take such offense to the criticism, but I truly don't care.  I buy what I like, and I don't need validation from my friends or family.

That being said, the bashing of Lori and Logo is getting out of control and it's tiring and boring.  People need to move on.  We all "get" it.  It's not for everyone.  Few really care!  I certainly don't care if one likes my choices.

---

You haven't looked in at the bashing of Susan Graver lately, have you, @winamac1. Puleeze, don't think Logo is anything speshul.

---

Yes I have.  I don't think it's as bad.  

---

I disagree. I don't think there is anything more negative than the comments against Susan Graver and her line, nor for as many years. Logo is just getting heat. And Susan Graver doesn't have "guards" on her bashing threads. It looks to me there are many more Logo fans who are determined to not permit negative comments about the fashion or the designer. Looks more like a control issue is going on.

---

i think the SG negativity has died down quite a bit and so has the negativity about renee greenstein......there just seems to be a TON of it directed at  LOGO and lori herself.

again, i would love to hear about what people actually DO like and buy on and off of qvc rather than what they DONT.

[Pearlee]

@sunshine45  Great post!    

[sunshine45]

adding one more thing......if you dont hang out in the LOGO forums then you dont see that not everyone likes everything......and they say it. it just isnt done in a rude or condescending way.

i dont think there is one poster on those threads that like every single thing that LORI puts out.

[febe1]

---

@sunshine45 wrote:

---

@febe1 wrote:

---

@winamac1 wrote:

---

@febe1 wrote:

---

@winamac1 wrote:

---

@Snicks1 wrote:
@winamac1, I could not agree more.

---

It's ridiculous how the same c a r a p p gets posted over and over and over again snicks.  Some take such offense to the criticism, but I truly don't care.  I buy what I like, and I don't need validation from my friends or family.

That being said, the bashing of Lori and Logo is getting out of control and it's tiring and boring.  People need to move on.  We all "get" it.  It's not for everyone.  Few really care!  I certainly don't care if one likes my choices.

---

You haven't looked in at the bashing of Susan Graver lately, have you, @winamac1. Puleeze, don't think Logo is anything speshul.

---

Yes I have.  I don't think it's as bad.  

---

I disagree. I don't think there is anything more negative than the comments against Susan Graver and her line, nor for as many years. Logo is just getting heat. And Susan Graver doesn't have "guards" on her bashing threads. It looks to me there are many more Logo fans who are determined to not permit negative comments about the fashion or the designer. Looks more like a control issue is going on.

---

i think the SG negativity has died down quite a bit and so has the negativity about renee greenstein......there just seems to be a TON of it directed at  LOGO and lori herself.

again, i would love to hear about what people actually DO like and buy on and off of qvc rather than what they DONT.

---

I disagree. As soon as SG is on, it increases, just as it does with LOGO. Well, you might go to threads that deal with what you love, rather than those who talk about what they "DONT." Fortunately, we can all pick and choose what we want to participate in @sunshine45.

[Alice-QVC]

This thread has been blocked for commenting because it is becoming

argumentative