Reply
Super Contributor
Posts: 252
Registered: ‎05-29-2010

I wish Lisa would make her pants longer, talls. Even her regular length is only 30 inches in most of her style.  I need a 33-34.  A 30 inch would be flood pants on me.  C'

mon Lisa, what about us tall gals, please.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,295
Registered: ‎03-27-2010

Re: Lisa Rinna pants in talls?

I'd be happy with a 32".  Average pants are usually floods on talls.

Highlighted
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,815
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Lisa Rinna pants in talls?

I think talks should be a minimum of 34".

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,270
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Lisa Rinna pants in talls?

It seems none of the designers have any idea what a tall inseam really should be. They also think if you need a long inseam then you must be big all over. We need normal sizes but with 34" to 38" inseams for talls. Some of us are short waisted and really long legged. All the pants on the models who have long legs are to short. If they have long torsos and their legs are not really long then they look fine. I know there is a market for long legged women and you would think they would be capitalizing on it!

Super Contributor
Posts: 476
Registered: ‎03-12-2010

Re: Lisa Rinna pants in talls?

I think that QVC is the one making the decisions for the designers if they can make tall pants.   I would love tall pants too because I am over 6ft tall.   I shop elsewhere for pants because QVC is not a good place for tall women to shop.